Difference between revisions of "Lepidium lasiocarpum"

Nuttall in J. Torrey and A. Gray

in J. Torrey and A. Gray, Fl. N. Amer. 1: 115. 1838.

Synonyms: Lepidium ruderale var. lasiocarpum (Nuttall) Engelmann ex A. Gray Nasturtium lasiocarpum (Nuttall) Kuntze
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 7. Treatment on page 584. Mentioned on page 573.
FNA>Volume Importer
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|name=Lepidium ruderale var. lasiocarpum
 
|name=Lepidium ruderale var. lasiocarpum
 
|authority=(Nuttall) Engelmann ex A. Gray
 
|authority=(Nuttall) Engelmann ex A. Gray
 +
|rank=variety
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=Nasturtium lasiocarpum
 
|name=Nasturtium lasiocarpum
 
|authority=(Nuttall) Kuntze
 
|authority=(Nuttall) Kuntze
 +
|rank=species
 
}}
 
}}
 
|hierarchy=Brassicaceae;Brassicaceae tribe Lepidieae;Lepidium;Lepidium lasiocarpum
 
|hierarchy=Brassicaceae;Brassicaceae tribe Lepidieae;Lepidium;Lepidium lasiocarpum
Line 27: Line 29:
 
|distribution=w United States;n Mexico.
 
|distribution=w United States;n Mexico.
 
|discussion=<p>Subspecies 3 (2 in the flora).</p><!--
 
|discussion=<p>Subspecies 3 (2 in the flora).</p><!--
--><p>R. C. Rollins (1993) and C. L. Hitchcock (1945) divided <i>Lepidium lasiocarpum</i> into four and seven varieties, respectively. Hitchcock admitted that the species is highly variable in every aspect and that his varieties cover some of the “more conspicuous” variations. In our opinion, perhaps two or three groups are somewhat sufficiently defined to be recognized formally, though the lines separating them blur in some parts of the species range. We are reluctantly treating them as subspecies; <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> palmeri</i> (S. Watson) Thellung is restricted to Mexico (Baja California). The other infraspecific taxa recognized by those authors are based on trivial differences in leaf and indumentum, and we do not believe that they merit recognition.</p><!--
+
--><p>R. C. Rollins (1993) and C. L. Hitchcock (1945) divided <i>Lepidium lasiocarpum</i> into four and seven varieties, respectively. Hitchcock admitted that the species is highly variable in every aspect and that his varieties cover some of the “more conspicuous” variations. In our opinion, perhaps two or three groups are somewhat sufficiently defined to be recognized formally, though the lines separating them blur in some parts of the species range. We are reluctantly treating them as subspecies; <i></i>subsp.<i> palmeri</i> (S. Watson) Thellung is restricted to Mexico (Baja California). The other infraspecific taxa recognized by those authors are based on trivial differences in leaf and indumentum, and we do not believe that they merit recognition.</p><!--
 
--><p>The reports by R. C. Rollins (1993) and N. H. Holmgren (2005b) of four and six stamens in <i>Lepidium lasiocarpum</i> were most likely repeated from C. L. Hitchcock (1936, 1945b) without further verification. We have examined hundreds of specimens that definitely belong to this species, and in not a single case did we find a flower with more than two stamens. It is quite likely that the reports of more than two stamens were based on misidentified plants.</p>
 
--><p>The reports by R. C. Rollins (1993) and N. H. Holmgren (2005b) of four and six stamens in <i>Lepidium lasiocarpum</i> were most likely repeated from C. L. Hitchcock (1936, 1945b) without further verification. We have examined hundreds of specimens that definitely belong to this species, and in not a single case did we find a flower with more than two stamens. It is quite likely that the reports of more than two stamens were based on misidentified plants.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
Line 51: Line 53:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Lepidium lasiocarpum
 
name=Lepidium lasiocarpum
|author=
 
 
|authority=Nuttall in J. Torrey and A. Gray
 
|authority=Nuttall in J. Torrey and A. Gray
 
|rank=species
 
|rank=species
Line 63: Line 64:
 
|publication year=1838
 
|publication year=1838
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V7/V7_944.xml
+
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V7/V7_944.xml
 
|tribe=Brassicaceae tribe Lepidieae
 
|tribe=Brassicaceae tribe Lepidieae
 
|genus=Lepidium
 
|genus=Lepidium

Revision as of 22:20, 16 December 2019

Annuals; hirsute or hispid, (trichomes cylindrical). Stems usually few to several, rarely simple from base, erect to ascending or (outer ones) decumbent, branched distally, (0.15–)0.6–3(–3.8) dm. Basal leaves (later withered); not rosulate; petiole (0.4–)1–3.5(–5) cm; blade spatulate to oblanceolate, lyrate-pinnatifid, pinnatisect, or 2-pinnatifid, (0.7–)1.5–4.5(–7.5) cm × (9–)12–20(–30) mm, margins rarely dentate, (lobes) entire or dentate. Cauline leaves subsessile or petioles 0.8–2.2 cm, blade lanceolate to oblanceolate, (0.7–)1.2–3.3(–5) cm × (2–)4–12 mm, base cuneate, not auriculate, margins subentire to dentate. Racemes often considerably elongated in fruit; rachis hirsute or hispid, trichomes straight, cylindrical. Fruiting pedicels divaricate-ascending to horizontal, straight or slightly curved, (often strongly flattened), (1.8–)2–4(–4.6) × 0.2–0.7 mm (to 0.3 mm thick), hirsute to hispid throughout or adaxially. Flowers: sepals oblong, 1–1.3(–1.5) × 0.5–0.8mm; petals (sometimes absent), white, oblanceolate to linear, (0.3–)0.6–1.5(–2) × (0.1–)0.2–0.5 mm, claw absent; stamens 2, median; filaments 1–1.4 mm; anthers 0.2–0.3 mm. Fruits ovate to ovate-orbicular, 2.8–4(–4.6) × 2.4–3.6(–4) mm, (base broadly cuneate to rounded), apically winged, apical notch (0.2–)0.3–0.6(–0.7) mm deep; valves thin, smooth, not veined, hirsute to hispid (on surface or margin); style obsolete or to 0.1 mm, included in apical notch. Seeds ovate, 1.4–2.2 × 0.9–1.4 mm.

Discussion

Subspecies 3 (2 in the flora).

R. C. Rollins (1993) and C. L. Hitchcock (1945) divided Lepidium lasiocarpum into four and seven varieties, respectively. Hitchcock admitted that the species is highly variable in every aspect and that his varieties cover some of the “more conspicuous” variations. In our opinion, perhaps two or three groups are somewhat sufficiently defined to be recognized formally, though the lines separating them blur in some parts of the species range. We are reluctantly treating them as subspecies; subsp. palmeri (S. Watson) Thellung is restricted to Mexico (Baja California). The other infraspecific taxa recognized by those authors are based on trivial differences in leaf and indumentum, and we do not believe that they merit recognition.

The reports by R. C. Rollins (1993) and N. H. Holmgren (2005b) of four and six stamens in Lepidium lasiocarpum were most likely repeated from C. L. Hitchcock (1936, 1945b) without further verification. We have examined hundreds of specimens that definitely belong to this species, and in not a single case did we find a flower with more than two stamens. It is quite likely that the reports of more than two stamens were based on misidentified plants.

Selected References

None.

Key

1 Fruit valves hirsute (or fringed on margin), trichomes not pustular-based; fruiting pedicels 0.2-0.4(-0.6) mm wide, usually less than 3 times as wide as thick; nectar glands toothlike, to 0.2 mm. Lepidium lasiocarpum subsp. lasiocarpum
1 Fruit valves hispid, trichomes pustular-based; fruiting pedicels (0.4-)0.5-0.7 mm wide, often more than 3 times as wide as thick; nectar glands not toothlike (subulate), 0.3-0.5 mm. Lepidium lasiocarpum subsp. wrightii