Difference between revisions of "Ranunculus adoneus"
Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 15: 56. 1863.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|name=Ranunculus adoneus var. alpinus | |name=Ranunculus adoneus var. alpinus | ||
|authority=(S. Watson) L. D. Benson | |authority=(S. Watson) L. D. Benson | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Ranunculus eschscholtzii var. adoneus | |name=Ranunculus eschscholtzii var. adoneus | ||
|authority=(A. Gray) C. L. Hitchcock | |authority=(A. Gray) C. L. Hitchcock | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Ranunculus eschscholtzii var. alpinus | |name=Ranunculus eschscholtzii var. alpinus | ||
|authority=(S. Watson) C. L. Hitchcock | |authority=(S. Watson) C. L. Hitchcock | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Ranunculaceae;Ranunculus;Ranunculus subg. Ranunculus;Ranunculus sect. Epirotes;Ranunculus adoneus | |hierarchy=Ranunculaceae;Ranunculus;Ranunculus subg. Ranunculus;Ranunculus sect. Epirotes;Ranunculus adoneus | ||
| Line 35: | Line 38: | ||
|elevation=2500-4000 m | |elevation=2500-4000 m | ||
|distribution=Colo.;Idaho;Mont.;Nev.;Utah;Wyo. | |distribution=Colo.;Idaho;Mont.;Nev.;Utah;Wyo. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Most collections of <i>Ranunculus adoneus</i> from Colorado, including the type specimen, tend to be small, with narrow leaf segments (only 0.5-1 mm wide) and large flowers. The more widespread form, with leaf segments 1-2 mm wide and more variable flowers, has been called <i>R. adoneus</i> < | + | |discussion=<p>Most collections of <i>Ranunculus adoneus</i> from Colorado, including the type specimen, tend to be small, with narrow leaf segments (only 0.5-1 mm wide) and large flowers. The more widespread form, with leaf segments 1-2 mm wide and more variable flowers, has been called <i>R. adoneus</i> <i></i>var.<i> alpinus</i>. The leaf and flower characteristics are very poorly correlated, however, and specimens referable to <i></i>var.<i> alpinus</i> vary greatly in stature and flower size, so the two forms scarcely merit formal recognition.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 44: | Line 47: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Ranunculus adoneus | name=Ranunculus adoneus | ||
| − | |||
|authority=A. Gray | |authority=A. Gray | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 58: | Line 60: | ||
|publication year=1863 | |publication year=1863 | ||
|special status=Endemic | |special status=Endemic | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V3/V3_1141.xml |
|genus=Ranunculus | |genus=Ranunculus | ||
|subgenus=Ranunculus subg. Ranunculus | |subgenus=Ranunculus subg. Ranunculus | ||
Revision as of 21:24, 16 December 2019
Stems erect from large caudices, 9-25 cm, glabrous, each with 1-3 flowers. Roots slender, 0.8-1.4 mm thick. Basal leaves persistent, blades circular to reniform in outline, 2-3×-dissected into linear segments, 0.9-2.5 × 1.1-2.8 cm, base obtuse, margins entire, apices of segments narrowly rounded to acute. Flowers: pedicels glabrous; receptacle glabrous; sepals 4-11 × 3-7 mm, abaxially sparsely pilose, hairs colorless; petals 5-10, 8-15 × 8-19 mm; nectary scale glabrous. Heads of achenes ovoid, 6-12 × 5-9 mm; achenes 1.8-2.4 × 1-1.4 mm, glabrous or nearly so; beak subulate, straight, 1.2-1.7 mm. 2 n = 16.
Habitat: Spring-summer (May–Sep). Alpine and subalpine meadows, usually around melting snowbanks
Elevation: 2500-4000 m
Distribution
Colo., Idaho, Mont., Nev., Utah, Wyo.
Discussion
Most collections of Ranunculus adoneus from Colorado, including the type specimen, tend to be small, with narrow leaf segments (only 0.5-1 mm wide) and large flowers. The more widespread form, with leaf segments 1-2 mm wide and more variable flowers, has been called R. adoneus var. alpinus. The leaf and flower characteristics are very poorly correlated, however, and specimens referable to var. alpinus vary greatly in stature and flower size, so the two forms scarcely merit formal recognition.
Selected References
None.