Difference between revisions of "Micranthes bryophora"
J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 1: 1020. 2007,.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|place=1: 1020. 2007, | |place=1: 1020. 2007, | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Saxifraga bryophora | |name=Saxifraga bryophora | ||
|authority=A. Gray | |authority=A. Gray | ||
| + | |publication_title=Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts | ||
| + | |publication_place=6: 533. 1865 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
| Line 52: | Line 54: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V8/V8_103.xml |
|genus=Micranthes | |genus=Micranthes | ||
|species=Micranthes bryophora | |species=Micranthes bryophora | ||
Revision as of 20:27, 24 September 2019
Plants solitary or tufted, with bulbils on caudices. Leaves ± basal; petiole absent; blade linear to narrowly elliptic, 0.5–4 cm, fleshy, base cuneate, margins subentire, ciliate, surfaces hirsute. Inflorescences usually 2–3+-flowered, open, lax thyrses, sometimes solitary flowers, (flowers terminal, proximal usually replaced by bulbils, sometimes bulbils absent), 2–25 cm, stipitate-glandular. (Pedicels reflexed.) Flowers: sepals reflexed, elliptic; petals white, each with 2 basal yellow spots, triangular to broadly ovate, clawed, 3–5 mm, longer than sepals; filaments linear, flattened; pistils connate 1/2+ their lengths; ovary superior, (to 1/3 adnate to hypanthium). Capsules green to yellow, purple tinged, valvate.
Phenology: Flowering summer.
Habitat: Wet meadows, rocky ledges
Elevation: 1600-4500 m
Discussion
Specimens of Micranthes bryophora from the disjunct populations in Idaho have been called Saxifraga bryophora var. tobiasiae; they appear to overlap in morphology with the California plants and are not distinguished here.
Selected References
None.