Difference between revisions of "Mirabilis sect. Oxybaphus"
in H. G. A. Engler and K. Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. 31[III,1b]: 24. 1889.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Treatment/ID | {{Treatment/ID | ||
|accepted_name=Mirabilis sect. Oxybaphus | |accepted_name=Mirabilis sect. Oxybaphus | ||
| − | |accepted_authority=(L’Heritier ex Willdenow) Heimerl | + | |accepted_authority=(L’Heritier ex Willdenow) Heimerl |
|publications={{Treatment/Publication | |publications={{Treatment/Publication | ||
|title=in H. G. A. Engler and K. Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. | |title=in H. G. A. Engler and K. Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|year=1889 | |year=1889 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Undefined sect. Oxybaphus | |name=Undefined sect. Oxybaphus | ||
|authority=L’Heritier ex Willdenow | |authority=L’Heritier ex Willdenow | ||
| + | |rank=section | ||
| + | |publication_title=Sp. Pl. | ||
| + | |publication_place=1(1): 170, 185. 1797 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms= | |synonyms= | ||
| Line 24: | Line 27: | ||
|distribution=sw United States;Mexico;Central America;South America. | |distribution=sw United States;Mexico;Central America;South America. | ||
|discussion=<p>Species ca. 25 (10 in the flora).</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Species ca. 25 (10 in the flora).</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p>Mirabilis sect. Oxybaphus is most diverse in the warm, semiarid regions of North America. Of all the subgroups (i.e., genera in P. C. Standley 1918) within a broadly constructed Mirabilis, sect. Oxybaphus has been the last to be maintained at the generic level by some authors of regional floras. The markedly accrescent involucres of most species make members of the section easily recognized. Standley (1931), in making transfers from Allionia and Oxybaphus to Mirabilis, noted that characteristics supposedly distinctive between segregate genera are not so in South America. C. F. Reed (1969) also used this justification for an inclusive Mirabilis in a treatment of Texas species.</p><!-- | + | --><p><i>Mirabilis </i>sect.<i> Oxybaphus</i> is most diverse in the warm, semiarid regions of North America. Of all the subgroups (i.e., genera in P. C. Standley 1918) within a broadly constructed <i>Mirabilis</i>, sect. Oxybaphus has been the last to be maintained at the generic level by some authors of regional floras. The markedly accrescent involucres of most species make members of the section easily recognized. Standley (1931), in making transfers from <i>Allionia</i> and Oxybaphus to <i>Mirabilis</i>, noted that characteristics supposedly distinctive between segregate genera are not so in South America. C. F. Reed (1969) also used this justification for an inclusive <i>Mirabilis</i> in a treatment of Texas species.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Taxonomy at the species level within the section is unusually problematic. In the introduction to his treatment for Mirabilis, L. H. Shinners (1951b) expressed biological and nomen-clatural problems that plague satisfactory classification. R. W. Cruden (1973) showed cleistogamic and chasmogamic flowers in M. nyctaginea, and self-compatibility in chasmogamic flowers, and R. Spellenberg (1998) mentioned other biological attributes that probably contribute to difficulties. The floral mechanism that Cruden described for M. nyctaginea (stamens and style curling together as the flowers close in late morning) is found in all species and ensures self-pollination. Cleistogamic flowers are found in many other species. Chasmogamic flowers are attractive in some species and are visited by various strong-flying pollinators, among them bees and hummingbirds. B. L. Turner (1993b) used the argument of cleistogamy and hybridization, combined with phenotypic plasticity, to support his concept of a widespread and variable M. albida. Ultimately, some species complexes in the section may be treated more satisfactorily with a number of broadly distributed and variable species, each consisting of a number of infraspecific taxa.</p><!-- | + | --><p>Taxonomy at the species level within the section is unusually problematic. In the introduction to his treatment for <i>Mirabilis</i>, L. H. Shinners (1951b) expressed biological and nomen-clatural problems that plague satisfactory classification. R. W. Cruden (1973) showed cleistogamic and chasmogamic flowers in <i>M. nyctaginea</i>, and self-compatibility in chasmogamic flowers, and R. Spellenberg (1998) mentioned other biological attributes that probably contribute to difficulties. The floral mechanism that Cruden described for <i>M. nyctaginea</i> (stamens and style curling together as the flowers close in late morning) is found in all species and ensures self-pollination. Cleistogamic flowers are found in many other species. Chasmogamic flowers are attractive in some species and are visited by various strong-flying pollinators, among them bees and hummingbirds. B. L. Turner (1993b) used the argument of cleistogamy and hybridization, combined with phenotypic plasticity, to support his concept of a widespread and variable <i>M. albida</i>. Ultimately, some species complexes in the section may be treated more satisfactorily with a number of broadly distributed and variable species, each consisting of a number of infraspecific taxa.</p><!-- |
--><p>Each species in this section intergrades in some respect with one or more others. Populations of these intergradient types are often highly uniform within. Here, insofar as practicable, species are recognized on combinations of characters that occur within some reasonably extensive geographic region and/or are found in populations that occur in certain rather well-defined ecological situations. Areas of difficult variation are the mountains of the south-western United States and the eastern base of the Rocky Mountains.</p><!-- | --><p>Each species in this section intergrades in some respect with one or more others. Populations of these intergradient types are often highly uniform within. Here, insofar as practicable, species are recognized on combinations of characters that occur within some reasonably extensive geographic region and/or are found in populations that occur in certain rather well-defined ecological situations. Areas of difficult variation are the mountains of the south-western United States and the eastern base of the Rocky Mountains.</p><!-- | ||
--><p>Measurements for leaves in the following descriptions are for leaves from mid-stem area. Leaves located toward the base are commonly proportionately broader and on longer petioles; those near and in the inflorescence are proportionately narrower and have much shorter petioles or are sessile.</p> | --><p>Measurements for leaves in the following descriptions are for leaves from mid-stem area. Leaves located toward the base are commonly proportionately broader and on longer petioles; those near and in the inflorescence are proportionately narrower and have much shorter petioles or are sessile.</p> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 39: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Mirabilis sect. Oxybaphus | name=Mirabilis sect. Oxybaphus | ||
| − | + | |authority=(L’Heritier ex Willdenow) Heimerl | |
| − | |authority=(L’Heritier ex Willdenow) Heimerl | ||
|rank=section | |rank=section | ||
|parent rank=genus | |parent rank=genus | ||
| Line 48: | Line 50: | ||
|publication year=1889 | |publication year=1889 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_97.xml |
|genus=Mirabilis | |genus=Mirabilis | ||
|section=Mirabilis sect. Oxybaphus | |section=Mirabilis sect. Oxybaphus | ||
Latest revision as of 22:02, 5 November 2020
Herbs, perennial, from cylindric, cordlike or thick and woody roots. Stems erect to decumbent, sparsely to densely leafy primarily in proximal 2/3 or throughout. Leaves: basal leaves petiolate, blade proportionately broader; distal leaves sessile or subsessile, blade narrower, margins entire to crisped. Inflorescences axillary and terminal in open or congested, few or repeatedly branched cymes (single in axils, especially in cleistogamous phases); involucres usually notably accrescent, becoming tan, translucent, prominently net-veined, broadly bell-shaped to saucer-shaped, with (1–)3 flowers inserted at base. Flowers: perianth broadly funnelform, abruptly flared from narrow tubes, deeply 5-lobed; stamens 3–5. Fruits with 5 low ribs, obovoid or narrowly obovate and tapering at both ends, base prominently constricted, apex rounded to nipplelike, surface of fruit slightly rugose to prominently tuberculate on ribs and/or sulci (or ribs and/or sulci without tubercles), glabrous or pubescent, mucilaginous when wetted.
Distribution
sw United States, Mexico, Central America, South America.
Discussion
Species ca. 25 (10 in the flora).
Mirabilis sect. Oxybaphus is most diverse in the warm, semiarid regions of North America. Of all the subgroups (i.e., genera in P. C. Standley 1918) within a broadly constructed Mirabilis, sect. Oxybaphus has been the last to be maintained at the generic level by some authors of regional floras. The markedly accrescent involucres of most species make members of the section easily recognized. Standley (1931), in making transfers from Allionia and Oxybaphus to Mirabilis, noted that characteristics supposedly distinctive between segregate genera are not so in South America. C. F. Reed (1969) also used this justification for an inclusive Mirabilis in a treatment of Texas species.
Taxonomy at the species level within the section is unusually problematic. In the introduction to his treatment for Mirabilis, L. H. Shinners (1951b) expressed biological and nomen-clatural problems that plague satisfactory classification. R. W. Cruden (1973) showed cleistogamic and chasmogamic flowers in M. nyctaginea, and self-compatibility in chasmogamic flowers, and R. Spellenberg (1998) mentioned other biological attributes that probably contribute to difficulties. The floral mechanism that Cruden described for M. nyctaginea (stamens and style curling together as the flowers close in late morning) is found in all species and ensures self-pollination. Cleistogamic flowers are found in many other species. Chasmogamic flowers are attractive in some species and are visited by various strong-flying pollinators, among them bees and hummingbirds. B. L. Turner (1993b) used the argument of cleistogamy and hybridization, combined with phenotypic plasticity, to support his concept of a widespread and variable M. albida. Ultimately, some species complexes in the section may be treated more satisfactorily with a number of broadly distributed and variable species, each consisting of a number of infraspecific taxa.
Each species in this section intergrades in some respect with one or more others. Populations of these intergradient types are often highly uniform within. Here, insofar as practicable, species are recognized on combinations of characters that occur within some reasonably extensive geographic region and/or are found in populations that occur in certain rather well-defined ecological situations. Areas of difficult variation are the mountains of the south-western United States and the eastern base of the Rocky Mountains.
Measurements for leaves in the following descriptions are for leaves from mid-stem area. Leaves located toward the base are commonly proportionately broader and on longer petioles; those near and in the inflorescence are proportionately narrower and have much shorter petioles or are sessile.
Selected References
None.