Difference between revisions of "Glandulicactus uncinatus"

(Galeotti) Backeberg

Beitr. Sukkulentenk. Sukkulentenpflege 1939(2): 34. 1939.

Illustrated
Basionym: Echinocactus uncinatus Galeotti Ab bild. Beschr. Cact. 2: plate 18. 1848
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 4. Mentioned on page 209.
FNA>Volume Importer
m (Bot: Adding category Revised Since Print)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
|year=1939
 
|year=1939
 
}}
 
}}
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 +
|code=F
 +
|label=Illustrated
 +
}}
 +
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym
 
|name=Echinocactus uncinatus
 
|name=Echinocactus uncinatus
 
|authority=Galeotti
 
|authority=Galeotti
 +
|rank=species
 +
|publication_title=Ab bild. Beschr. Cact.
 +
|publication_place=2: plate 18. 1848
 
}}
 
}}
 
|synonyms=
 
|synonyms=
Line 22: Line 29:
  
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
|distribution=sw United States;Mexico.
+
|distribution=N.Mex.;Tex.;Mexico.
 
|discussion=<p>Varieties 2 (1 in the flora).</p><!--
 
|discussion=<p>Varieties 2 (1 in the flora).</p><!--
--><p>Without its reddish flowers or fruits, Glandulicactus uncinatus resembles Ancistrocactus brevihamatus and, especially, Ferocactus hamatacanthus. The variable areoles of the three species are similar except for the diagnostic hooks on the abaxial radial spines of Glandulicactus.</p><!--
+
--><p>Without its reddish flowers or fruits, <i>Glandulicactus uncinatus</i> resembles <i>Ancistrocactus brevihamatus</i> and, especially, <i>Ferocactus hamatacanthus</i>. The variable areoles of the three species are similar except for the diagnostic hooks on the abaxial radial spines of <i>Glandulicactus</i>.</p><!--
--><p>Glandulicactus uncinatus differs from Hamatocactus bicolor of the Tamaulipan thorn scrub by its strongly crenate ribs, greatly elongated areoles on sexually mature plants, dome-shaped instead of peg-shaped areolar glands, broadly funnelform-campanulate receptacle, tricolpate pollen, relatively large perisperm, and strongly curved embryos. The peculiar dark red to russet or brownish purple tepals of Glandulicactus contrast with the bright yellow inner tepals of Hamatocactus, but both genera share showy red fruits and hooked central spines. Straight-spined variants are well known in Hamatocactus bicolor, but not reported in Glandulicactus, where even the abaxial radial spines are consistently hooked.</p>
+
--><p><i>Glandulicactus uncinatus</i> differs from <i>Hamatocactus bicolor</i> of the Tamaulipan thorn scrub by its strongly crenate ribs, greatly elongated areoles on sexually mature plants, dome-shaped instead of peg-shaped areolar glands, broadly funnelform-campanulate receptacle, tricolpate pollen, relatively large perisperm, and strongly curved embryos. The peculiar dark red to russet or brownish purple tepals of <i>Glandulicactus</i> contrast with the bright yellow inner tepals of <i>Hamatocactus</i>, but both genera share showy red fruits and hooked central spines. Straight-spined variants are well known in <i>Hamatocactus bicolor</i>, but not reported in <i>Glandulicactus</i>, where even the abaxial radial spines are consistently hooked.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 34: Line 41:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Glandulicactus uncinatus
 
name=Glandulicactus uncinatus
|author=
 
 
|authority=(Galeotti) Backeberg
 
|authority=(Galeotti) Backeberg
 
|rank=species
 
|rank=species
Line 41: Line 47:
 
|basionyms=Echinocactus uncinatus
 
|basionyms=Echinocactus uncinatus
 
|family=Cactaceae
 
|family=Cactaceae
|distribution=sw United States;Mexico.
+
|distribution=N.Mex.;Tex.;Mexico.
 
|reference=None
 
|reference=None
 
|publication title=Beitr. Sukkulentenk. Sukkulentenpflege
 
|publication title=Beitr. Sukkulentenk. Sukkulentenpflege
 
|publication year=1939
 
|publication year=1939
|special status=
+
|special status=Illustrated
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_388.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_388.xml
 
|subfamily=Cactaceae subfam. Cactoideae
 
|subfamily=Cactaceae subfam. Cactoideae
 
|genus=Glandulicactus
 
|genus=Glandulicactus
Line 52: Line 58:
 
}}<!--
 
}}<!--
  
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Glandulicactus]]
+
-->
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Treatment]]
 +
[[Category:Glandulicactus]]
 +
[[Category:Revised Since Print]]

Latest revision as of 17:04, 6 November 2020

Discussion

Varieties 2 (1 in the flora).

Without its reddish flowers or fruits, Glandulicactus uncinatus resembles Ancistrocactus brevihamatus and, especially, Ferocactus hamatacanthus. The variable areoles of the three species are similar except for the diagnostic hooks on the abaxial radial spines of Glandulicactus.

Glandulicactus uncinatus differs from Hamatocactus bicolor of the Tamaulipan thorn scrub by its strongly crenate ribs, greatly elongated areoles on sexually mature plants, dome-shaped instead of peg-shaped areolar glands, broadly funnelform-campanulate receptacle, tricolpate pollen, relatively large perisperm, and strongly curved embryos. The peculiar dark red to russet or brownish purple tepals of Glandulicactus contrast with the bright yellow inner tepals of Hamatocactus, but both genera share showy red fruits and hooked central spines. Straight-spined variants are well known in Hamatocactus bicolor, but not reported in Glandulicactus, where even the abaxial radial spines are consistently hooked.

Selected References

None.