Difference between revisions of "Thalictrum macrostylum"
Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 3: 8. 1892.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
− | |name= | + | |name=Thalictrum subrotundum |
|authority=B. Boivin | |authority=B. Boivin | ||
+ | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Ranunculaceae;Thalictrum;Thalictrum sect. Leucocoma;Thalictrum macrostylum | |hierarchy=Ranunculaceae;Thalictrum;Thalictrum sect. Leucocoma;Thalictrum macrostylum | ||
Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
|elevation=500-800 m | |elevation=500-800 m | ||
|distribution=Ala.;Fla.;Ga.;Miss.;N.C.;S.C.;Va. | |distribution=Ala.;Fla.;Ga.;Miss.;N.C.;S.C.;Va. | ||
− | |discussion=<p>Much variation in Thalictrum macrostylum seems to be associated with habitat differences, especially the amount of sunlight received. The name T. subrotundum merely represents plants of T. macrostylum growing in deep shade. Common garden studies and cluster analyses do not support recognition of two species (M. Park 1992).</p> | + | |discussion=<p>Much variation in <i>Thalictrum macrostylum</i> seems to be associated with habitat differences, especially the amount of sunlight received. The name T. subrotundum merely represents plants of <i>T. macrostylum</i> growing in deep shade. Common garden studies and cluster analyses do not support recognition of two species (M. Park 1992).</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Thalictrum macrostylum | name=Thalictrum macrostylum | ||
− | |||
|authority=Small & A. Heller | |authority=Small & A. Heller | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
|parent rank=section | |parent rank=section | ||
− | |synonyms= | + | |synonyms=Thalictrum subrotundum |
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|family=Ranunculaceae | |family=Ranunculaceae | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|publication year=1892 | |publication year=1892 | ||
|special status=Endemic | |special status=Endemic | ||
− | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V3/V3_926.xml |
|genus=Thalictrum | |genus=Thalictrum | ||
|section=Thalictrum sect. Leucocoma | |section=Thalictrum sect. Leucocoma |
Latest revision as of 21:52, 5 November 2020
Stems erect to ± reclining, slender, 50-200 cm, glabrous. Leaves basal and cauline; basal and proximal cauline petiolate, distal cauline sessile; petioles and rachises glabrous, neither pubescent nor glandular. Leaf blade ternately and pinnately decompound; leaflets grayish green to brownish to bright green, nearly orbiculate to ovate or obovate, apically undivided or shallowly 2-3-lobed, 5-16(-22) × 3-18 mm, length 1-3.3 times width, leathery and prominently reticulate abaxially, or sometimes quite membranous, margins sometimes revolute, lobe margins entire; surfaces abaxially glabrous. Inflorescences racemes or panicles, elongate, few flowered; peduncles and pedicels neither pubescent nor glandular. Flowers either unisexual with staminate and pistillate on different plants, or bisexual and unisexual with staminate and bisexual on some plants, pistillate and bisexual on others; sepals 4(-6), greenish to white, nearly orbiculate, 1-2 mm; filaments white, filiform or sometimes clavate, 1.8-4 mm, rigid to flexible; anthers 0.5-1.2 mm. Achenes numerous, slightly stipitate; stipe 0.3-0.7 mm; body ovoid, 3-4.5 mm, prominently veined, glabrous; beak 0.7-1.7 mm. 2n = 56.
Phenology: Flowering late spring–summer (early Jun-mid Jul).
Habitat: Low woods, rich wooded slopes, cliffs, swampy forests, meadows, and limestone sinks
Elevation: 500-800 m
Distribution
Ala., Fla., Ga., Miss., N.C., S.C., Va.
Discussion
Much variation in Thalictrum macrostylum seems to be associated with habitat differences, especially the amount of sunlight received. The name T. subrotundum merely represents plants of T. macrostylum growing in deep shade. Common garden studies and cluster analyses do not support recognition of two species (M. Park 1992).
Selected References
None.