Difference between revisions of "Crataegus pruinosa var. magnifolia"

(Sargent) J. B. Phipps

Novon 16: 386. 2006.

Conservation concernEndemic
Basionym: Crataegus magnifolia Sargent Trees & Shrubs 2: 69, plate 132. 1908
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 577. Mentioned on page 575, 578.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
imported>Volume Importer
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|label=Endemic
 
|label=Endemic
 
}}
 
}}
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym
 
|name=Crataegus magnifolia
 
|name=Crataegus magnifolia
 
|authority=Sargent
 
|authority=Sargent
 +
|rank=species
 +
|publication_title=Trees & Shrubs
 +
|publication_place=2: 69, plate 132. 1908
 
}}
 
}}
 
|synonyms=
 
|synonyms=
Line 34: Line 37:
 
|distribution=Mo.
 
|distribution=Mo.
 
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!--
 
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!--
--><p>Variety magnifolia, a local variant from Jasper County in southern Missouri, not seen for many years, is distinct for its remarkable leaf shape and cream anthers. It would be more consistent with the logic of this treatment to place var. magnifolia with Crataegus cognata, but the combination has not been made.</p>
+
--><p>Variety magnifolia, a local variant from Jasper County in southern Missouri, not seen for many years, is distinct for its remarkable leaf shape and cream anthers. It would be more consistent with the logic of this treatment to place <i></i>var.<i> magnifolia</i> with <i>Crataegus cognata</i>, but the combination has not been made.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 43: Line 46:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Crataegus pruinosa var. magnifolia
 
name=Crataegus pruinosa var. magnifolia
|author=
 
 
|authority=(Sargent) J. B. Phipps
 
|authority=(Sargent) J. B. Phipps
 
|rank=variety
 
|rank=variety
Line 58: Line 60:
 
|publication year=2006
 
|publication year=2006
 
|special status=Conservation concern;Endemic
 
|special status=Conservation concern;Endemic
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_983.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_983.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae

Latest revision as of 23:00, 5 November 2020

Shrubs or trees, height not recorded. Leaves: blade ovate to ovate-deltate, 5–7 cm, length/width = 1.3–1.5, lobes 0 or 1–4 per side, obscure, lobe apex ± obtuse, base broadly cuneate to subtruncate, adaxial surface glabrous, sometimes sparsely appressed-hairy along veins. Inflorescence branches glabrous. Flowers 18 mm diam.; stamens 20, anthers cream.


Phenology: Flowering Apr; fruiting Sep–Oct.
Habitat: Chalk barrens, along rocky watercourses
Elevation: 100–200 m

Discussion

Of conservation concern.

Variety magnifolia, a local variant from Jasper County in southern Missouri, not seen for many years, is distinct for its remarkable leaf shape and cream anthers. It would be more consistent with the logic of this treatment to place var. magnifolia with Crataegus cognata, but the combination has not been made.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.