Difference between revisions of "Amelanchier canadensis var. obovalis"
Prelim. Cat., 17. 1888.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|label=Endemic | |label=Endemic | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Mespilus canadensis var. obovalis | |name=Mespilus canadensis var. obovalis | ||
|authority=Michaux | |authority=Michaux | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
| + | |publication_title=Fl. Bor.-Amer. | ||
| + | |publication_place=1: 291. 1803 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Amelanchier canadensis subsp. obovalis | |name=Amelanchier canadensis subsp. obovalis | ||
|authority=(Michaux) P. Landry | |authority=(Michaux) P. Landry | ||
| + | |rank=subspecies | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae;Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae;Amelanchier;Amelanchier canadensis;Amelanchier canadensis var. obovalis | |hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae;Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae;Amelanchier;Amelanchier canadensis;Amelanchier canadensis var. obovalis | ||
| Line 33: | Line 37: | ||
|elevation=0–200 m | |elevation=0–200 m | ||
|distribution=Del.;Ga.;Md.;N.J.;N.C.;Pa.;S.C.;Va. | |distribution=Del.;Ga.;Md.;N.J.;N.C.;Pa.;S.C.;Va. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>C. T. Frye (2006) found morphologic evidence of introgression between var. canadensis and var. obovalis; the introgression may have been facilitated by land clearing and other anthropogenic disturbances. Variety obovalis represents a geographic trend towards smaller petal and inflorescence dimensions in the southern range; there is much overlap range-wide. Additionally, characters such as plant height and extent of lateral spread that have been used in major couplets of keys are variable and may largely depend on site disturbance history, for example, mowing, burning. Variety obovalis is self-incompatible and apparently sexual (C. T. Frye, unpubl.) and diploid throughout its range (M. B. Burgess et al., unpubl.). The triploid count (2n = 51) is represented by a single specimen determined by W. A. Robinson and C. R. Partenen (1980).</p> | + | |discussion=<p>C. T. Frye (2006) found morphologic evidence of introgression between <i></i>var.<i> canadensis</i> and <i></i>var.<i> obovalis</i>; the introgression may have been facilitated by land clearing and other anthropogenic disturbances. Variety obovalis represents a geographic trend towards smaller petal and inflorescence dimensions in the southern range; there is much overlap range-wide. Additionally, characters such as plant height and extent of lateral spread that have been used in major couplets of keys are variable and may largely depend on site disturbance history, for example, mowing, burning. Variety obovalis is self-incompatible and apparently sexual (C. T. Frye, unpubl.) and diploid throughout its range (M. B. Burgess et al., unpubl.). The triploid count (2n = 51) is represented by a single specimen determined by W. A. Robinson and C. R. Partenen (1980).</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 42: | Line 46: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Amelanchier canadensis var. obovalis | name=Amelanchier canadensis var. obovalis | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Michaux) Britton | |authority=(Michaux) Britton | ||
|rank=variety | |rank=variety | ||
| Line 57: | Line 60: | ||
|publication year=1888 | |publication year=1888 | ||
|special status=Endemic | |special status=Endemic | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_1133.xml |
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae | |subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae | ||
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae | |tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae | ||
Latest revision as of 22:54, 5 November 2020
Shrubs, 0.2–2 m. Stems 1–100, forming dense colonies and often evidently stoloniferous. Leaves: blade elliptic or oval to oblong or obovate, (24–)34–40(–62) × (12–)18–27(–38) mm, base subcordate to cuneate, apex acute or obtuse and mucronate, surfaces glabrous (or sparsely hairy). Inflorescences (5–)7–9(–11)-flowered, usually compact, (6–)15–27(–45) mm. Pedicels: (0 or)1 subtended by a leaf, proximalmost (1–)5–10(–15) mm. Flowers: sepals ascending or spreading after flowering, (0.8–)1.8–2.7(–4) mm; petals elliptic, (5–)6–8(–10.4) × (1.9–)2.6–3.5(–4.3) mm; stamens (15–)19–21(–28); styles (3 or)4 or 5(or 6). Pomes purplish black, 6–8 mm diam. 2n = 2x, 3x.
Phenology: Flowering Mar–May; fruiting May–Jun.
Habitat: Pine savannas, sandhills, roadsides, dry openings in woods, sandy soil
Elevation: 0–200 m
Distribution
Del., Ga., Md., N.J., N.C., Pa., S.C., Va.
Discussion
C. T. Frye (2006) found morphologic evidence of introgression between var. canadensis and var. obovalis; the introgression may have been facilitated by land clearing and other anthropogenic disturbances. Variety obovalis represents a geographic trend towards smaller petal and inflorescence dimensions in the southern range; there is much overlap range-wide. Additionally, characters such as plant height and extent of lateral spread that have been used in major couplets of keys are variable and may largely depend on site disturbance history, for example, mowing, burning. Variety obovalis is self-incompatible and apparently sexual (C. T. Frye, unpubl.) and diploid throughout its range (M. B. Burgess et al., unpubl.). The triploid count (2n = 51) is represented by a single specimen determined by W. A. Robinson and C. R. Partenen (1980).
Selected References
None.