Difference between revisions of "Viola sagittata var. sagittata"
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|accepted_authority=[E] | |accepted_authority=[E] | ||
|publications= | |publications= | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=E | ||
| + | |label=Endemic | ||
| + | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Viola emarginata | |name=Viola emarginata | ||
|authority=(Nuttall) Leconte | |authority=(Nuttall) Leconte | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=species |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=V. sagittata var. emarginata | |name=V. sagittata var. emarginata | ||
|authority=Nuttall | |authority=Nuttall | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=variety |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=V. sagittata var. subsagittata | |name=V. sagittata var. subsagittata | ||
|authority=(Greene) Pollard | |authority=(Greene) Pollard | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=variety |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=V. subsagittata | |name=V. subsagittata | ||
| − | |authority= | + | |authority= |
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Violaceae;Viola;Viola sagittata;Viola sagittata var. sagittata | |hierarchy=Violaceae;Viola;Viola sagittata;Viola sagittata var. sagittata | ||
| Line 31: | Line 39: | ||
|elevation=50–2500 m | |elevation=50–2500 m | ||
|distribution=N.S.;Ont.;Que.;Ala.;Ark.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;La.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;Tenn.;Tex.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis. | |distribution=N.S.;Ont.;Que.;Ala.;Ark.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Ga.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;La.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;N.J.;N.Y.;N.C.;Ohio;Okla.;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;Tenn.;Tex.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Although exhibiting variation in leaf-blade shape, var. sagittata is usually easily distinguished. There have been misconceptions regarding the identity of Viola emarginata, a species thought for a time to be different from V. sagittata. The type specimen of V. emarginata is conspecific with that of V. sagittata; E. L. Greene (1898b), apparently not having seen the type, portrayed V. emarginata with a somewhat deltate leaf form. N. H. Russell and A. C. Risser (1960) suggested that most collections representing V. emarginata were hybrids.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p>Although exhibiting variation in leaf-blade shape, <i></i>var.<i> sagittata</i> is usually easily distinguished. There have been misconceptions regarding the identity of <i>Viola</i> emarginata, a species thought for a time to be different from <i>V. sagittata</i>. The type specimen of V. emarginata is conspecific with that of <i>V. sagittata</i>; E. L. Greene (1898b), apparently not having seen the type, portrayed V. emarginata with a somewhat deltate leaf form. N. H. Russell and A. C. Risser (1960) suggested that most collections representing V. emarginata were hybrids.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Variety sagittata reportedly hybridizes with V. cucullata (= V. ×porteriana Pollard), V. hirsutula (= V. ×redacta House), V. pedatifida var. brittoniana (= V. ×mulfordiae Pollard), V. sagittata var. ovata (= V. ×abundans House), and V. sororia var. sororia (= V. ×conjugens Greene).</p> | + | --><p>Variety sagittata reportedly hybridizes with <i>V. cucullata</i> (= V. ×porteriana Pollard), <i>V. hirsutula</i> (= V. ×redacta House), <i>V. pedatifida</i> var. brittoniana (= V. ×mulfordiae Pollard), <i>V. sagittata </i>var.<i> ovata</i> (= V. ×abundans House), and <i>V. sororia</i> var. sororia (= V. ×conjugens Greene).</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 41: | Line 49: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Viola sagittata var. sagittata | name=Viola sagittata var. sagittata | ||
| − | |||
|authority=[E] | |authority=[E] | ||
|rank=variety | |rank=variety | ||
| Line 55: | Line 62: | ||
|publication title= | |publication title= | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Endemic |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V6/V6_278.xml |
|genus=Viola | |genus=Viola | ||
|species=Viola sagittata | |species=Viola sagittata | ||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 5 November 2020
Leaves: earliest blades ovate to elliptic; mid-season blades ovate or narrowly elliptic to narrowly deltate, 1.5–7 × 1–5 cm, base sagittate, hastate, or ± cordate, margins serrate, ciliate or eciliate, surfaces glabrous or sparsely pubescent. Sepal margins eciliate. Cleistogamous flowers on ascending to erect peduncles. 2n = 54.
Phenology: Flowering Mar–May.
Habitat: Sandy, open woods, fields, disturbed ground, roadsides, powerline rights-of-way
Elevation: 50–2500 m
Distribution
N.S., Ont., Que., Ala., Ark., Conn., Del., D.C., Ga., Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Maine, Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., N.J., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va., W.Va., Wis.
Discussion
Although exhibiting variation in leaf-blade shape, var. sagittata is usually easily distinguished. There have been misconceptions regarding the identity of Viola emarginata, a species thought for a time to be different from V. sagittata. The type specimen of V. emarginata is conspecific with that of V. sagittata; E. L. Greene (1898b), apparently not having seen the type, portrayed V. emarginata with a somewhat deltate leaf form. N. H. Russell and A. C. Risser (1960) suggested that most collections representing V. emarginata were hybrids.
Variety sagittata reportedly hybridizes with V. cucullata (= V. ×porteriana Pollard), V. hirsutula (= V. ×redacta House), V. pedatifida var. brittoniana (= V. ×mulfordiae Pollard), V. sagittata var. ovata (= V. ×abundans House), and V. sororia var. sororia (= V. ×conjugens Greene).
Selected References
None.