Difference between revisions of "Eupatorium"
Sp. Pl. 2: 836. 1753.
Gen. Pl. ed. 5, 363. 1754.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
--><p>Species identification within <i>Eupatorium</i> is sometimes complicated; polyploidy and apomixis have contributed to the complications. Some species include both sexual diploid and apomictic polyploid plants or populations. V. I. Sullivan (1972) made important contributions to understanding <i>Eupatorium</i> in North America by showing that some fairly distinct, sexual diploid species may include apomictic polyploid plants or populations that do not differ greatly from the diploids. Other apomictic polyploids appear to be intermediate morphologically between pairs of diploid or diploid/polyploid species and were proposed by Sullivan to have originated from interspecific hybridization. Distinction and level of recognition of hybrid apomictic taxa have a large arbitrary component, in part because some apomicts appear to be ephemeral and others may be relatively stable and in part because differences in the relative genomic contributions of the progenitors through dosage effects or backcrossing may affect whether an apomict is morphologically distinctive or part of a continuous series of variation.</p> | --><p>Species identification within <i>Eupatorium</i> is sometimes complicated; polyploidy and apomixis have contributed to the complications. Some species include both sexual diploid and apomictic polyploid plants or populations. V. I. Sullivan (1972) made important contributions to understanding <i>Eupatorium</i> in North America by showing that some fairly distinct, sexual diploid species may include apomictic polyploid plants or populations that do not differ greatly from the diploids. Other apomictic polyploids appear to be intermediate morphologically between pairs of diploid or diploid/polyploid species and were proposed by Sullivan to have originated from interspecific hybridization. Distinction and level of recognition of hybrid apomictic taxa have a large arbitrary component, in part because some apomicts appear to be ephemeral and others may be relatively stable and in part because differences in the relative genomic contributions of the progenitors through dosage effects or backcrossing may affect whether an apomict is morphologically distinctive or part of a continuous series of variation.</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
− | |references= | + | |references={{Treatment/Reference |
+ | |id=sullivan1972a | ||
+ | |text=Sullivan, V. I. 1972. Investigations of the Breeding Systems, Formation of Auto- and Alloploids and the Reticulate Pattern of Hybridization in North American Eupatorium (Compositae). Ph.D. dissertation. Florida State University. | ||
+ | }} | ||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
Line 258: | Line 261: | ||
|family=Asteraceae | |family=Asteraceae | ||
|distribution=e North America;Europe;e Asia. | |distribution=e North America;Europe;e Asia. | ||
− | |reference= | + | |reference=sullivan1972a |
|publication title=Sp. Pl.;Gen. Pl. ed. | |publication title=Sp. Pl.;Gen. Pl. ed. | ||
|publication year=1753;1754 | |publication year=1753;1754 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
− | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_1155.xml |
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Eupatorieae | |tribe=Asteraceae tribe Eupatorieae | ||
|genus=Eupatorium | |genus=Eupatorium |
Latest revision as of 20:08, 5 November 2020
Perennials, 30–200 cm. Stems erect, usually not branched proximal to arrays of heads (from caudices or rhizomes). Leaves mostly cauline; usually opposite (rarely whorled, distal sometimes alternate); petiolate or sessile; blades usually 3-nerved from or distal to bases, or pinnately nerved, mostly deltate or ovate to lanceolate or linear (and intermediate shapes, sometimes elliptic, oblong, rhombic, or suborbiculate, sometimes pinnatifid, 1–2-pinnately, ternately, or palmately lobed), ultimate margins entire or toothed, faces glabrous or puberulent, pubescent, scabrous, or setulose, usually gland-dotted. Heads discoid, in corymbiform or diffuse to dense, paniculiform arrays. Involucres obconic to ellipsoid, 1–3(–5+) mm diam. Phyllaries persistent, 7–15+ in 2–3(–4+) series, (usually green) 2–3-nerved, or not notably nerved, or pinnately nerved, elliptic, lanceolate, oblong, or obovate, usually unequal, sometimes ± equal (margins scarious, hyaline, apices rounded to acute or acuminate sometimes mucronate, faces usually puberulent or villous, usually gland-dotted, rarely glabrous). Receptacles flat or convex, epaleate. Florets (3–)5(–15+); corollas usually white, rarely pinkish, throats funnelform to campanulate, lobes 5, triangular; styles: bases sometimes enlarged, usually puberulent (glabrous in E. capillifolium), branches mostly filiform. Cypselae (brownish to black) prismatic, 5-ribbed, usually glabrous, usually gland-dotted; pappi persistent, of 20–50 (whitish) barbellulate bristles in 1 series. x = 10.
Distribution
e North America, Europe, e Asia.
Discussion
Species 41+ (24 species, including 2 hybrids, in the flora).
Eupatorium is treated here in a restricted circumscription, following R. M. King and H. Robinson (1987) in excluding genera that traditionally have been included in a broad Eupatorium (e.g., Ageratina, Chromolaena, Critonia, Conoclinium, Fleischmannia, Koanophyllon, Tamaulipa); Eutrochium (Eupatorium sect. Verticillatum) is also excluded here.
Species identification within Eupatorium is sometimes complicated; polyploidy and apomixis have contributed to the complications. Some species include both sexual diploid and apomictic polyploid plants or populations. V. I. Sullivan (1972) made important contributions to understanding Eupatorium in North America by showing that some fairly distinct, sexual diploid species may include apomictic polyploid plants or populations that do not differ greatly from the diploids. Other apomictic polyploids appear to be intermediate morphologically between pairs of diploid or diploid/polyploid species and were proposed by Sullivan to have originated from interspecific hybridization. Distinction and level of recognition of hybrid apomictic taxa have a large arbitrary component, in part because some apomicts appear to be ephemeral and others may be relatively stable and in part because differences in the relative genomic contributions of the progenitors through dosage effects or backcrossing may affect whether an apomict is morphologically distinctive or part of a continuous series of variation.
Lower Taxa
Key
1 | Leaves (at least the principal) pinnatifid, or pinnately or ternately lobed, or palmately 3(–5)-lobed | > 2 |
1 | Leaves simple (not lobed, margins crenate, entire, laciniate, serrate, or serrulate) | > 6 |
2 | Leaves (at least larger proximal) palmately 3(–5)-lobed (lobes relatively broad, margins serrate; corollas usually pinkish) | Eupatorium cannabinum |
2 | Leaves pinnatifid or pinnately or ternately lobed (lobes relatively narrow; corollas usually white) | > 3 |
3 | Leaves (mostly ternately or 1–2-pinnately lobed): blades or lobes linear; heads in subcorymbiform to subpaniculiform arrays; florets 7–9 | Eupatorium ×pinnatifidum |
3 | Leaves (usually pinnately or ternately lobed or pinnatifid): blades or lobes linear; heads in paniculiform arrays; florets usually 5 | > 4 |
4 | Stems glabrous (gland-dotted, branches supporting heads recurved and secund) | Eupatorium leptophyllum |
4 | Stems puberulent (branches supporting heads not recurved or secund) | > 5 |
5 | Leaf blades or lobes 0.2–0.5(–1) mm wide (margins strongly revolute); phyllaries usually glabrate or glabrous, usually not gland-dotted | Eupatorium capillifolium |
5 | Leaf blades or lobes 0.5–2.5(–4) mm wide; phyllaries usually puberulent(mostly on midveins), usually gland-dotted | Eupatorium compositifolium |
6 | Leaves petiolate (petioles 10–30 mm) | > 7 |
6 | Leaves sessile or subsessile (petioles 0 or 1–10 mm) | > 8 |
7 | Leaf blades deltate to rhombic (held vertically; stems green); florets 5 | Eupatorium mikanioides |
7 | Leaf blades lanceolate (held horizontally; stems sometimes reddish to purplish);florets 9–15 | Eupatorium serotinum |
8 | Florets 7–11 (leaf bases connate-perfoliate) | Eupatorium perfoliatum |
8 | Florets (4–)5–8 or 9–14 (leaf bases not connate-perfoliate) | > 9 |
9 | Florets usually 9–14 | Eupatorium resinosum |
9 | Florets (4–)5–8 | > 10 |
10 | Phyllary apices (usually white) acuminate to attenuate | > 11 |
10 | Phyllary apices (usually with narrow white margins, sometimes pigmented) acute, obtuse, or rounded | > 15 |
11 | Leaf bases (especially larger leaves) clasping to narrowly connate-perfoliate (leaf faces rugose); florets 5–8 | Eupatorium ×cordigerum |
11 | Leaf bases attenuate, cuneate, or rounded (leaf faces relatively smooth); florets (4–)5 | > 12 |
12 | Leaves 4–10(–15) mm wide | Eupatorium leucolepis |
12 | Leaves mostly 10–45 mm wide | > 13 |
13 | Leaves little, if at all, gland-dotted; phyllaries glabrous, not gland-dotted (the larger 8–10 mm) | Eupatorium petaloideum |
13 | Leaves usually gland-dotted; phyllaries puberulent to villous (at least toward bases and on midveins), gland-dotted (the larger 5–10 mm) | > 14 |
14 | Leaf blades elliptic to oblanceolate (lengths mostly 3–4 times widths), bases narrowly cuneate (sometimesoblique); phyllaries linear (larger 6–9 mm) | Eupatorium album |
14 | Leaf blades elliptic, lanceolate, or lance-ovate (lengths mostly 1–2 times widths), bases rounded to rounded-cuneate; phyllaries oblong to lance-oblong (larger 5–7mm) | Eupatorium pilosum |
15 | Stems glabrous or glabrate proximally (and leaves pinnately nerved, 70–150 mm); leaves: bases truncate to somewhat rounded, facesglabrate (scattered, fine hairs) | Eupatorium sessilifolium |
15 | Stems usually pilose, puberulent, or pubescent proximally or throughout (if glabrous, leaves 3-nerved from bases, 30–50 × 5–13 mm, bases narrowly cuneate); leaves (3-nerved from or distal to bases or pinnately nerved): bases usually narrowly to broadly cuneate, rounded, subcordate, or truncate, sometimes clasping to perfoliate, faces glabrous, puberulent, scabrous, or villous. | > 16 |
16 | Leaf blades deltate, elliptic, lanceolate, lance-ovate, ovate, or suborbiculate (usually broadest proximal to middles), bases usually broadly cuneate, rounded, subcordate, or truncate, sometimes clasping to perfoliate | > 17 |
16 | Leaf blades elliptic, lance-elliptic, lanceolate, lance-oblong, linear, oblanceolate, or oblong (usually broadest near or distal to middles), bases cuneate | > 20 |
17 | Leaf bases (especially larger leaves) clasping to narrowly connate-perfoliate (faces conspicuously rugose); florets 5–8 | Eupatorium ×cordigerum |
17 | Leaf bases broadly cuneate, rounded, subcordate, or truncate (faces smooth to somewhat rugose); florets (4–)5 | > 18 |
18 | Leaves pinnately nerved, blades usually 50–100 mm | Eupatorium godfreyanum |
18 | Leaves 3-nerved, blades 15–50(–90) mm | > 19 |
19 | Leaf blades elliptic, lanceolate, or lance-ovate (lengths mostly 2–2.5 times widths, usually with purple borders, sometimes visible only in live plants; distal leaves sometimes alternate) | Eupatorium pilosum |
19 | Leaf blades usually deltate to suborbiculate, sometimes ovate (lengths mostly1–2 times widths; distal leaves sometimes alternate) | Eupatorium rotundifolium |
20 | Leaves strongly to obscurely 3-nerved from bases | > 21 |
20 | Leaves 3-nerved distal to bases, or pinnately nerved, or relatively narrow and obscurely 3-nerved from bases | > 23 |
21 | Stems usually glabrous or glabrate (at least proximally), sometimes pilose; leaves 30–50 mm, faces glabrous abaxially | Eupatorium lancifolium |
21 | Stems pubescent or pilose proximally or throughout; leaves 20–60(–120, the larger usually 50+) mm, faces puberulent, scabrous, or villous abaxially | > 22 |
22 | Leaves: margins entire proximally, serrate distally (teeth sharp, antrorse; mid-ribs and 2 major lateral veins prominent) | Eupatorium altissimum |
22 | Leaves: margins usually laciniate-serrate (teeth ± divergent; 2 major lateral veins usually obscure) | Eupatorium hyssopifolium |
23 | Leaves usually in whorls (3s or 4s), sometimes opposite, blades lance-linear to linear (lengths 6–40 times widths) | Eupatorium hyssopifolium |
23 | Leaves usually opposite (sometimes whorled in E. semiserratum), blades elliptic, lance-elliptic, lance-oblong, oblanceolate, or oblong (lengths 2.5–7 times widths) | > 24 |
24 | Leaves (spreading): blades adaxially finely puberulent or villous (stems from short caudices or rhizomes) | > 25 |
24 | Leaves (ascending, recurved, or spreading): blades adaxially glabrous or glabrate (stems from tuberous-thickened rhizomes, not usually apparent until flowering is well under way) | > 26 |
25 | Stems densely branched distally; leaf blades (30–)50–70 mm, margins usually serrate; phyllaries elliptic (larger 2.5–3 mm); corollas 2.5–3 mm | Eupatorium semiserratum |
25 | Stems usually branched at or near bases; leaf blades mostly 20–35(–45) mm, margins weakly serrate to subentire; phyllaries lanceolate (larger usually 4–5 mm); corollas 3–3.5 mm | Eupatorium linearifolium |
26 | Leaves (usually spreading or ascending): blades 15–50 × (5–)10–20 mm | Eupatorium anomalum |
26 | Leaves (usually recurved): blades 20–80 × 5–10(–20) mm | Eupatorium mohrii |