Difference between revisions of "Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila"

(Rose) K. M. Nakai

Madroño 34: 336. 1988,.

Endemic
Basionym: Dudleya pumila Rose in N. L. Britton and J. N. Rose, New N. Amer. Crassul., 14. 1903
Synonyms: Dudleya goldmanii Rose
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 8. Treatment on page 181. Mentioned on page 180, 182.
FNA>Volume Importer
imported>Volume Importer
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|title=Madroño
 
|title=Madroño
 
|place=34: 336. 1988,
 
|place=34: 336. 1988,
 +
}}
 +
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 +
|code=E
 +
|label=Endemic
 
}}
 
}}
 
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym
 
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym
 
|name=Dudleya pumila
 
|name=Dudleya pumila
 
|authority=Rose
 
|authority=Rose
 +
|rank=species
 
|publication_title=in N. L. Britton and J. N. Rose, New N. Amer. Crassul.,
 
|publication_title=in N. L. Britton and J. N. Rose, New N. Amer. Crassul.,
 
|publication_place=14. 1903
 
|publication_place=14. 1903
Line 15: Line 20:
 
|name=Dudleya goldmanii
 
|name=Dudleya goldmanii
 
|authority=Rose
 
|authority=Rose
 +
|rank=species
 
}}
 
}}
 
|hierarchy=Crassulaceae;Dudleya;Dudleya subg. Dudleya;Dudleya cymosa;Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila
 
|hierarchy=Crassulaceae;Dudleya;Dudleya subg. Dudleya;Dudleya cymosa;Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila
Line 30: Line 36:
 
|elevation=100-2600 m
 
|elevation=100-2600 m
 
|distribution=Calif.
 
|distribution=Calif.
|discussion=<p>Plants of <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> pumila</i> in the San Gabriel Mountains are rather uniformly small, with the rosette leaves rhomboid and short-acuminate to cuspidate. Taken by themselves, they would seem a quite well-distinguished subspecies, and many plants of the Santa Lucia Mountains are similar. Plants of the San Bernardino Mountains are similar but apparently more variable; in the Santa Lucia Mountains the plants are perhaps even more variable, some like <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> cymosa</i>. Thus there is no clear line between the two subspecies.</p>
+
|discussion=<p>Plants of <i></i>subsp.<i> pumila</i> in the San Gabriel Mountains are rather uniformly small, with the rosette leaves rhomboid and short-acuminate to cuspidate. Taken by themselves, they would seem a quite well-distinguished subspecies, and many plants of the Santa Lucia Mountains are similar. Plants of the San Bernardino Mountains are similar but apparently more variable; in the Santa Lucia Mountains the plants are perhaps even more variable, some like <i></i>subsp.<i> cymosa</i>. Thus there is no clear line between the two subspecies.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 39: Line 45:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila
 
name=Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila
|author=
 
 
|authority=(Rose) K. M. Nakai
 
|authority=(Rose) K. M. Nakai
 
|rank=subspecies
 
|rank=subspecies
Line 53: Line 58:
 
|publication title=Madroño
 
|publication title=Madroño
 
|publication year=
 
|publication year=
|special status=
+
|special status=Endemic
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V8/V8_358.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V8/V8_358.xml
 
|genus=Dudleya
 
|genus=Dudleya
 
|subgenus=Dudleya subg. Dudleya
 
|subgenus=Dudleya subg. Dudleya

Latest revision as of 22:43, 5 November 2020

Caudices simple or 2–5-branched, 1–2(–3.5) cm diam. Leaves: rosettes usually 10–25-leaved; blade green, rhombic-oblanceolate to spatulate, 1.5–5(–10) × 1–3(–6) cm, apex mostly short-acuminate to cuspidate, surfaces sometimes farinose, glaucous. Inflorescences: floral shoots 5–20-leaved, 5–15(–25) cm; cincinni 3+, 3–6-flowered, mostly 1–3 cm. Petals bright yellow to red, 10–12 × 2.5–4 mm. 2n = 34.


Phenology: Flowering spring.
Habitat: Rock crevices, rocky slopes
Elevation: 100-2600 m

Discussion

Plants of subsp. pumila in the San Gabriel Mountains are rather uniformly small, with the rosette leaves rhomboid and short-acuminate to cuspidate. Taken by themselves, they would seem a quite well-distinguished subspecies, and many plants of the Santa Lucia Mountains are similar. Plants of the San Bernardino Mountains are similar but apparently more variable; in the Santa Lucia Mountains the plants are perhaps even more variable, some like subsp. cymosa. Thus there is no clear line between the two subspecies.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.