Show Lower Taxa
Difference between revisions of "Piriqueta cistoides"
Fl. Brit. W. I., 298. 1860.
Illustrated
Basionym: Turnera cistoides Linnaeus Sp. Pl. ed. 2, 1: 387. 1762
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 6. Treatment on page 166.
FNA>Volume Importer |
RevisionBot (talk | contribs) m (Bot: Adding category Revised Since Print) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
|code=F | |code=F | ||
| − | |label= | + | |label=Illustrated |
}} | }} | ||
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | ||
|name=Turnera cistoides | |name=Turnera cistoides | ||
|authority=Linnaeus | |authority=Linnaeus | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
|publication_title=Sp. Pl. ed. | |publication_title=Sp. Pl. ed. | ||
|publication_place=2, 1: 387. 1762 | |publication_place=2, 1: 387. 1762 | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
-->{{Treatment/Body | -->{{Treatment/Body | ||
| − | |distribution= | + | |distribution=Ala.;Fla.;Ga.;S.C.;West Indies;South America. |
|discussion=<p>Subspecies 2 (1 in the flora).</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Subspecies 2 (1 in the flora).</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p>Within <i>Piriqueta</i>, <i>P. cistoides</i> has the widest distribution. Both subspecies show wide morphological variation; subsp. cistoides is homostylous and self compatible; < | + | --><p>Within <i>Piriqueta</i>, <i>P. cistoides</i> has the widest distribution. Both subspecies show wide morphological variation; subsp. cistoides is homostylous and self compatible; <i></i>subsp.<i> caroliniana</i> is distylous and self incompatible. In Cuba, Dominican Republic, and northern South America, intermediate specimens (10% of the total) cannot be assigned morphologically to one subspecies or the other. R. Ornduff (1970c) made crosses between and among the subspecies; he found no reproductive barriers among the different morphs of <i></i>subsp.<i> caroliniana</i>; the fertility of the hybrids between both subspecies was higher than that of the hybrids among populations of subsp. cistoides. Subspecies cistoides has been reported from Georgia; the author has not seen specimens.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Piriqueta cistoides | name=Piriqueta cistoides | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Linnaeus) Grisebach | |authority=(Linnaeus) Grisebach | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
|basionyms=Turnera cistoides | |basionyms=Turnera cistoides | ||
|family=Turneraceae | |family=Turneraceae | ||
| − | |distribution= | + | |distribution=Ala.;Fla.;Ga.;S.C.;West Indies;South America. |
|reference=None | |reference=None | ||
|publication title=Fl. Brit. W. I., | |publication title=Fl. Brit. W. I., | ||
|publication year=1860 | |publication year=1860 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Illustrated |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V6/V6_302.xml |
|genus=Piriqueta | |genus=Piriqueta | ||
|species=Piriqueta cistoides | |species=Piriqueta cistoides | ||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
| − | -->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Piriqueta]] | + | --> |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Treatment]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Piriqueta]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Revised Since Print]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:12, 6 November 2020
Distribution
Ala., Fla., Ga., S.C., West Indies, South America.
Discussion
Subspecies 2 (1 in the flora).
Within Piriqueta, P. cistoides has the widest distribution. Both subspecies show wide morphological variation; subsp. cistoides is homostylous and self compatible; subsp. caroliniana is distylous and self incompatible. In Cuba, Dominican Republic, and northern South America, intermediate specimens (10% of the total) cannot be assigned morphologically to one subspecies or the other. R. Ornduff (1970c) made crosses between and among the subspecies; he found no reproductive barriers among the different morphs of subsp. caroliniana; the fertility of the hybrids between both subspecies was higher than that of the hybrids among populations of subsp. cistoides. Subspecies cistoides has been reported from Georgia; the author has not seen specimens.
Selected References
None.