Difference between revisions of "Cyperus sanguinolentus"
Enum. Pl. 2: 351. 1805.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|place=2: 351. 1805 | |place=2: 351. 1805 | ||
|year=1805 | |year=1805 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=I | ||
| + | |label=Introduced | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=F | ||
| + | |label=Illustrated | ||
}} | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
| Line 11: | Line 18: | ||
|name=Cyperus louisianensis | |name=Cyperus louisianensis | ||
|authority=Thieret | |authority=Thieret | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Pycreus sanguinolentus | |name=Pycreus sanguinolentus | ||
|authority=(Vahl) Nees | |authority=(Vahl) Nees | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Cyperaceae;Cyperus;Cyperus subg. Pycreus;Cyperus sanguinolentus | |hierarchy=Cyperaceae;Cyperus;Cyperus subg. Pycreus;Cyperus sanguinolentus | ||
| Line 29: | Line 38: | ||
|elevation=20 m | |elevation=20 m | ||
|distribution=Ala.;Ga.;La.;Miss.;Asia;Africa. | |distribution=Ala.;Ga.;La.;Miss.;Asia;Africa. | ||
| + | |introduced=true | ||
|discussion=<p><i>Cyperus sanguinolentus</i> is the only rhizomatous, distigmatic <i>Cyperus</i> in the eastern United States. An early collection from Louisiana was described as C. louisianensis, supposedly endemic. Recent field work and morphometric studies convincingly showed it to be an introduction of the Asian <i>C. sanguinolentus</i>) (J. R. Carter and C. T. Bryson 2001.</p> | |discussion=<p><i>Cyperus sanguinolentus</i> is the only rhizomatous, distigmatic <i>Cyperus</i> in the eastern United States. An early collection from Louisiana was described as C. louisianensis, supposedly endemic. Recent field work and morphometric studies convincingly showed it to be an introduction of the Asian <i>C. sanguinolentus</i>) (J. R. Carter and C. T. Bryson 2001.</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
| Line 41: | Line 51: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Cyperus sanguinolentus | name=Cyperus sanguinolentus | ||
| − | |||
|authority=Vahl | |authority=Vahl | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 56: | Line 65: | ||
|publication title=Enum. Pl. | |publication title=Enum. Pl. | ||
|publication year=1805 | |publication year=1805 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Introduced;Illustrated |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V23/V23_257.xml |
|genus=Cyperus | |genus=Cyperus | ||
|subgenus=Cyperus subg. Pycreus | |subgenus=Cyperus subg. Pycreus | ||
Latest revision as of 20:39, 5 November 2020
Herbs, perennial; rhizomes ± horizontal, to 12 cm × 0.8–1.2 mm. Culms ± terete to roundly trigonous, 3–25(–60) cm × 0.3–2 mm, glabrous. Leaves 1–3, V-shaped, 1–8(–15) cm × 1–2 mm. Inflorescences: spike 1, loosely ovoid, 7–14 × 8–20 mm; rays (0–)1–4, to 2(–3) cm; bracts 2–4, horizontal to ascending at 30(–45)°, V-shaped to flat, 1–8(–18) cm × 0.5–1.5(–2) mm. Spikelets 3–5(–14), oblong to linear-lanceoloid, 8–18 × 2–2.6(–3) mm; floral scales (6–)10–26(–32), laterally clear to light brown, sometimes with purplish margins, medially light brown, 2-keeled, laterally ribless, medially 2–3-ribbed, oblong to ovate, 1.9–2.2(–2.7) × 1.8–2.3 mm, apex obtuse. Flowers: stamens 3; anthers ellipsoid, 0.3–0.6 mm, connective not prolonged; styles 0.6–1 mm; stigmas 1–1.5 mm. Achenes brown, ± stipitate, obovoid to ovoid, 1–1.4 × 0.6–0.8 mm, apex truncate, apiculate, surfaces minutely punctate.
Phenology: Fruiting late summer–fall.
Habitat: Emergent shorelines, ditches
Elevation: 20 m
Distribution
Introduced; Ala., Ga., La., Miss., Asia, Africa.
Discussion
Cyperus sanguinolentus is the only rhizomatous, distigmatic Cyperus in the eastern United States. An early collection from Louisiana was described as C. louisianensis, supposedly endemic. Recent field work and morphometric studies convincingly showed it to be an introduction of the Asian C. sanguinolentus) (J. R. Carter and C. T. Bryson 2001.