Difference between revisions of "Diplacus bigelovii var. cuspidatus"
Phytoneuron 2012-39: 28. 2012.
Endemic
Basionym: Mimulus bigelovii var. cuspidatus A. L. Grant Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 11: 279. 1925
Synonyms: M. bigelovii var. panamintensis Munz M. spissus A. L. Grant
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|name=Mimulus bigelovii var. cuspidatus | |name=Mimulus bigelovii var. cuspidatus | ||
|authority=A. L. Grant | |authority=A. L. Grant | ||
+ | |rank=variety | ||
|publication_title=Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. | |publication_title=Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. | ||
|publication_place=11: 279. 1925 | |publication_place=11: 279. 1925 | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
|name=M. bigelovii var. panamintensis | |name=M. bigelovii var. panamintensis | ||
|authority=Munz | |authority=Munz | ||
+ | |rank=variety | ||
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=M. spissus | |name=M. spissus | ||
|authority=A. L. Grant | |authority=A. L. Grant | ||
+ | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Phrymaceae;Diplacus;Diplacus bigelovii;Diplacus bigelovii var. cuspidatus | |hierarchy=Phrymaceae;Diplacus;Diplacus bigelovii;Diplacus bigelovii var. cuspidatus | ||
Line 38: | Line 41: | ||
|elevation=(10–)100–2300(–3300) m. | |elevation=(10–)100–2300(–3300) m. | ||
|distribution=Ariz.;Calif.;Nev.;Utah. | |distribution=Ariz.;Calif.;Nev.;Utah. | ||
− | |discussion=<p>Leaves of < | + | |discussion=<p>Leaves of <i></i>var.<i> cuspidatus</i> sometimes are more congested near stem tips under conditions of severe drought stress. Seeds from plants identified as <i>Mimulus</i> spissus, with leaves and flowers densely crowded at least distally, were greenhouse grown by D. M. Thompson (2005), who found that they produced plants identical to <i></i>var.<i> cuspidatus</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 47: | Line 50: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Diplacus bigelovii var. cuspidatus | name=Diplacus bigelovii var. cuspidatus | ||
− | |||
|authority=(A. L. Grant) G. L. Nesom | |authority=(A. L. Grant) G. L. Nesom | ||
|rank=variety | |rank=variety | ||
Line 62: | Line 64: | ||
|publication year=2012 | |publication year=2012 | ||
|special status=Endemic | |special status=Endemic | ||
− | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V17/V17_1372.xml |
|genus=Diplacus | |genus=Diplacus | ||
|species=Diplacus bigelovii | |species=Diplacus bigelovii |
Latest revision as of 19:30, 5 November 2020
Stem internodes usually subequal. Leaf blades: proximals obovate to oblanceolate, distals usually relatively broader, apices of proximals abruptly acute-acuminate, distals abruptly acuminate, sometimes cuspidate.
Phenology: Flowering Feb–Jun(–Sep).
Habitat: Washes, dry hillsides, limestone outcrops, scree slopes, periphery of trees and shrubs.
Elevation: (10–)100–2300(–3300) m.
Distribution
Ariz., Calif., Nev., Utah.
Discussion
Leaves of var. cuspidatus sometimes are more congested near stem tips under conditions of severe drought stress. Seeds from plants identified as Mimulus spissus, with leaves and flowers densely crowded at least distally, were greenhouse grown by D. M. Thompson (2005), who found that they produced plants identical to var. cuspidatus.
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
None.