Difference between revisions of "Crataegus (sect. Coccineae) ser. Coccineae"
Man. Cult. Trees ed. 2, 362. 1940.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Treatment/ID | {{Treatment/ID | ||
|accepted_name=Crataegus (sect. Coccineae) ser. Coccineae | |accepted_name=Crataegus (sect. Coccineae) ser. Coccineae | ||
| − | |accepted_authority= | + | |accepted_authority= |
|publications={{Treatment/Publication | |publications={{Treatment/Publication | ||
|title=Man. Cult. Trees ed. | |title=Man. Cult. Trees ed. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|label=Endemic | |label=Endemic | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Crataegus sect. Coccineae | |name=Crataegus sect. Coccineae | ||
|authority=Loudon | |authority=Loudon | ||
| + | |rank=section | ||
| + | |publication_title=Arbor. Frutic. Brit. | ||
| + | |publication_place=2: 816. 1838 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Lobulatae | |name=Lobulatae | ||
|authority=Sargent | |authority=Sargent | ||
| + | |rank=unranked | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae;Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae;Crataegus;Crataegus sect. Coccineae;Crataegus (sect. Coccineae) ser. Coccineae | |hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae;Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae;Crataegus;Crataegus sect. Coccineae;Crataegus (sect. Coccineae) ser. Coccineae | ||
| Line 32: | Line 36: | ||
|discussion=<p>Species 3 (3 in the flora).</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Species 3 (3 in the flora).</p><!-- | ||
--><p>As treated here, ser. Coccineae has three species, largely following J. A. Macklin (2001). They occur from extreme southeastern Minnesota and Illinois eastward through the southern Great Lakes to southern New England and south down the Appalachians to North Carolina.</p><!-- | --><p>As treated here, ser. Coccineae has three species, largely following J. A. Macklin (2001). They occur from extreme southeastern Minnesota and Illinois eastward through the southern Great Lakes to southern New England and south down the Appalachians to North Carolina.</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p>Members of ser. Coccineae are easily confused with those of ser. Molles; Crataegus pennsylvanica from that series keys out in the first couplet. A detailed comparison is presented with ser. Molles. The best distinctions concern bracteoles (hairier and more herbaceous in ser. Molles) and indumentum (more likely tomentose in ser. Molles). Rare putative hybrids with various species are recorded, including ser. Dilatatae (C. putnamiana Sargent), ser. Punctatae (C. mansfieldensis Sargent), ser. Tenuifoliae (C. merita Sargent), ser. Populneae (C. xanthophylla Sargent); see also section on interserial hybrids.</p><!-- | + | --><p>Members of ser. Coccineae are easily confused with those of ser. Molles; <i>Crataegus pennsylvanica</i> from that series keys out in the first couplet. A detailed comparison is presented with ser. Molles. The best distinctions concern bracteoles (hairier and more herbaceous in ser. Molles) and indumentum (more likely tomentose in ser. Molles). Rare putative hybrids with various species are recorded, including ser. Dilatatae (C. putnamiana Sargent), ser. Punctatae (C. mansfieldensis Sargent), ser. Tenuifoliae (C. merita Sargent), ser. Populneae (C. xanthophylla Sargent); see also section on interserial hybrids.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Confusion about the name of the series was caused by C. S. Sargent (1901), who suggested that Crataegus coccinea was the correct name for C. chrysocarpa (at that time called C. rotundifolia). Consequently, until his correction in 1909, the group Coccineae by Sargent was approximately the current ser. Rotundifoliae. His original view was followed by various other workers, which added to the confusion.</p><!-- | + | --><p>Confusion about the name of the series was caused by C. S. Sargent (1901), who suggested that <i>Crataegus coccinea</i> was the correct name for <i>C. chrysocarpa</i> (at that time called <i>C. rotundifolia</i>). Consequently, until his correction in 1909, the group Coccineae by Sargent was approximately the current ser. Rotundifoliae. His original view was followed by various other workers, which added to the confusion.</p><!-- |
--><p>Members of ser. Coccineae are shrubs or trees of forest edges and gaps as well as successional sites on agricultural land. They can be exceptionally attractive throughout the growing season and are among the most dramatic fall-fruiting shrubs. Anthesis is early midseason relative to sympatric species.</p> | --><p>Members of ser. Coccineae are shrubs or trees of forest edges and gaps as well as successional sites on agricultural land. They can be exceptionally attractive throughout the growing season and are among the most dramatic fall-fruiting shrubs. Anthesis is early midseason relative to sympatric species.</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
| Line 93: | Line 97: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Crataegus (sect. Coccineae) ser. Coccineae | name=Crataegus (sect. Coccineae) ser. Coccineae | ||
| − | + | |authority= | |
| − | |authority= | ||
|rank=series | |rank=series | ||
|parent rank=section | |parent rank=section | ||
| Line 105: | Line 108: | ||
|publication year=1940 | |publication year=1940 | ||
|special status=Endemic | |special status=Endemic | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_945.xml |
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae | |subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae | ||
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae | |tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae | ||
Latest revision as of 23:00, 5 November 2020
Shrubs or trees, (40–)70–120 dm, main trunk dominant. Stems: trunk bark older buff, newly exposed orange, exfoliating in fibrous plates, freshly exposed bark orange-brown (not recorded for some species); branches spreading; twigs ± straight, new growth glabrous or hairy, 1-year old golden to pale tan, older light gray; thorns on twigs few to numerous, straight to recurved, 2-years old dark blackish brown, shiny, ± stout, sometimes slender, 2–6 cm. Leaves: petiole length 30–40% blade, glabrate to hairy, eglandular or at least some glandular; blade bright green, broadly elliptic to elliptic-ovate or ± ovate to deltate-ovate, (4–)5–8(–10) cm, thin, base cuneate to subtruncate, rarely slightly cordate, lobes 4 or 5 per side, sinuses shallow to ± deep, lobe apex acute, sometimes acuminate, margins serrate, teeth numerous, venation craspedodromous, veins 5–7(or 8) per side, apex acute to subacute, abaxial surface usually glabrous, veins pubescent, adaxial appressed-pubescent. Inflorescences 8–15-flowered, convex panicles; branches usually pubescent, rarely glabrous or tomentose; bracteoles caducous, linear, membranous, margins sessile- or short-stipitate-glandular. Flowers 16–22 mm diam.; hypanthium usually pubescent, sometimes glabrous; sepals narrowly triangular, much shorter than petals, margins glandular-serrate; stamens 5–8, rarely 10 or 20, anthers pink to rose-purple, sometimes crimson; styles (3 or)4 or 5. Pomes bright to deep red, suborbicular to oblong or ± ovoid, sometimes ellipsoid to broadly pyriform, 10–14 mm tall, glabrous or villous; flesh ± mealy, mellow; sepals variably persistent, ± spreading or erose, non-accrescent; pyrenes (3 or)4 or 5.
Distribution
c, e North America, introduced in Europe.
Discussion
Species 3 (3 in the flora).
As treated here, ser. Coccineae has three species, largely following J. A. Macklin (2001). They occur from extreme southeastern Minnesota and Illinois eastward through the southern Great Lakes to southern New England and south down the Appalachians to North Carolina.
Members of ser. Coccineae are easily confused with those of ser. Molles; Crataegus pennsylvanica from that series keys out in the first couplet. A detailed comparison is presented with ser. Molles. The best distinctions concern bracteoles (hairier and more herbaceous in ser. Molles) and indumentum (more likely tomentose in ser. Molles). Rare putative hybrids with various species are recorded, including ser. Dilatatae (C. putnamiana Sargent), ser. Punctatae (C. mansfieldensis Sargent), ser. Tenuifoliae (C. merita Sargent), ser. Populneae (C. xanthophylla Sargent); see also section on interserial hybrids.
Confusion about the name of the series was caused by C. S. Sargent (1901), who suggested that Crataegus coccinea was the correct name for C. chrysocarpa (at that time called C. rotundifolia). Consequently, until his correction in 1909, the group Coccineae by Sargent was approximately the current ser. Rotundifoliae. His original view was followed by various other workers, which added to the confusion.
Members of ser. Coccineae are shrubs or trees of forest edges and gaps as well as successional sites on agricultural land. They can be exceptionally attractive throughout the growing season and are among the most dramatic fall-fruiting shrubs. Anthesis is early midseason relative to sympatric species.
Selected References
Lower Taxa
Key
| 1 | Stamens 5 or 6, or 10, anthers cream to pale pink or salmon; inflorescence branches tomentose; pomes densely villous; sepals in fruit erect-patent, ± accrescent. | Crataegus pennsylvanica (ser. Molles) |
| 1 | Stamens 5–8, rarely 10 or 20, anthers pink to rose-purple, sometimes crimson; inflorescence branches sparsely to densely pubescent, rarely glabrous or tomentose; pomes glabrous or pubescent; sepals in fruit ± spreading, non-accrescent, sometimes erose | > 2 |
| 2 | Stamens 20 | > 3 |
| 2 | Stamens 5–10 | > 5 |
| 3 | Leaf blades ovate to elliptic-ovate, bases ± cuneate. | Crataegus coccinea |
| 3 | Leaf blades ovate to deltate-ovate, bases broadly ± cordate or rounded to truncate. | Crataegus magniflora |
| 5 | Leaf blades ovate or broadly elliptic, bases broadly cuneate to subtruncate, rarely slightly cordate; twigs: new growth greenish; stamens (5–)8–10; pomes usually bright red, suborbicular to oblong; thorns on twigs ± stout, 2–4 cm. | Crataegus coccinea |
| 5 | Leaf blades ± narrowly ovate, bases cuneate or ± rounded; twigs: new growth greenish to reddish; stamens 5–8(–10); pomes bright to deep red, ellipsoid to broadly pyriform; thorns on twigs often slender, 3–6 cm. | Crataegus holmesiana |