Difference between revisions of "Ivesia sect. Stellariopsis"
Novon 17: 317. 2007.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|label=Endemic | |label=Endemic | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Potentilla sect. Stellariopsis | |name=Potentilla sect. Stellariopsis | ||
|authority=Baillon | |authority=Baillon | ||
| + | |rank=section | ||
| + | |publication_title=Hist. Pl. | ||
| + | |publication_place=1: 370. 1869 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Undefined sect. Stellariopsis | |name=Undefined sect. Stellariopsis | ||
|authority=(Baillon) Rydberg | |authority=(Baillon) Rydberg | ||
| + | |rank=section | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae;Ivesia;Ivesia sect. Stellariopsis | |hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae;Ivesia;Ivesia sect. Stellariopsis | ||
| Line 31: | Line 35: | ||
|distribution=Calif. | |distribution=Calif. | ||
|discussion=<p>Species 1.</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Species 1.</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p>P. A. Rydberg (1898) recognized Stellariopsis at the generic level primarily on the basis of the obcordate anthers, which apparently open by terminal pores, as well as the single carpel, mousetail-like leaves, diffuse inflorescence, and flowers intermediate between Ivesia and Potentilla. J. Soják (2008) argued that the anther character alone justifies generic status. Examination of a series of flowers shows that porelike dehiscence is largely a result of the extreme shortness of the anthers relative to width, such that longer-than-average anthers approach a more typical dehiscence mode. The single carpel and mousetail-like leaves are consistent within the taxon, although both are found elsewhere in the genus (albeit not in the same species). The relatively large, maroon-tipped stipitate glands of the inflorescence branches, including the pedicel and hypanthium, are otherwise unknown in Ivesia.</p> | + | --><p>P. A. Rydberg (1898) recognized Stellariopsis at the generic level primarily on the basis of the obcordate anthers, which apparently open by terminal pores, as well as the single carpel, mousetail-like leaves, diffuse inflorescence, and flowers intermediate between <i>Ivesia</i> and <i>Potentilla</i>. J. Soják (2008) argued that the anther character alone justifies generic status. Examination of a series of flowers shows that porelike dehiscence is largely a result of the extreme shortness of the anthers relative to width, such that longer-than-average anthers approach a more typical dehiscence mode. The single carpel and mousetail-like leaves are consistent within the taxon, although both are found elsewhere in the genus (albeit not in the same species). The relatively large, maroon-tipped stipitate glands of the inflorescence branches, including the pedicel and hypanthium, are otherwise unknown in <i>Ivesia</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 40: | Line 44: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Ivesia sect. Stellariopsis | name=Ivesia sect. Stellariopsis | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Baillon) Ertter & Reveal | |authority=(Baillon) Ertter & Reveal | ||
|rank=section | |rank=section | ||
| Line 52: | Line 55: | ||
|publication year=2007 | |publication year=2007 | ||
|special status=Endemic | |special status=Endemic | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_383.xml |
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | |subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | ||
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae | |tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae | ||
Latest revision as of 22:56, 5 November 2020
Plants tufted, not forming hanging clumps, not aromatic; taproot ± stout, not fusiform or fleshy. Stems (1–)1.5–4 dm. Basal leaves very tightly cylindric (mousetail-like); stipules present; leaflets tightly overlapping, individually scarcely distinguishable, lobed to base, sometimes entire, densely hairy; terminal leaflets indistinct. Cauline leaves 1–3, not paired; blade relatively well developed. Inflorescences open, flowers arranged individually. Pedicels remaining ± straight. Flowers: hypanthium shallowly campanulate; petals not medially reflexed, white, short-clawed, apex rounded; stamens 15, anthers shorter than wide, dehiscing by subterminal pores to short lateral slits; carpels 1. Achenes vertical, smooth, not carunculate.
Discussion
Species 1.
P. A. Rydberg (1898) recognized Stellariopsis at the generic level primarily on the basis of the obcordate anthers, which apparently open by terminal pores, as well as the single carpel, mousetail-like leaves, diffuse inflorescence, and flowers intermediate between Ivesia and Potentilla. J. Soják (2008) argued that the anther character alone justifies generic status. Examination of a series of flowers shows that porelike dehiscence is largely a result of the extreme shortness of the anthers relative to width, such that longer-than-average anthers approach a more typical dehiscence mode. The single carpel and mousetail-like leaves are consistent within the taxon, although both are found elsewhere in the genus (albeit not in the same species). The relatively large, maroon-tipped stipitate glands of the inflorescence branches, including the pedicel and hypanthium, are otherwise unknown in Ivesia.
Selected References
None.