Difference between revisions of "Crataegus chrysocarpa var. blanchardii"

(Sargent) J. B. Phipps

J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 1: 1009. 2007.

Endemic
Basionym: Crataegus blanchardii Sargent Rhodora 7: 218. 1905 (as blanchardi)
Synonyms: C. irrasa var. blanchardii (Sargent) Eggleston
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 600. Mentioned on page 597.
FNA>Volume Importer
imported>Volume Importer
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|name=Crataegus blanchardii
 
|name=Crataegus blanchardii
 
|authority=Sargent
 
|authority=Sargent
 +
|rank=species
 
|publication_title=Rhodora
 
|publication_title=Rhodora
 
|publication_place=7: 218. 1905 (as blanchardi)
 
|publication_place=7: 218. 1905 (as blanchardi)
Line 20: Line 21:
 
|name=C. irrasa var. blanchardii
 
|name=C. irrasa var. blanchardii
 
|authority=(Sargent) Eggleston
 
|authority=(Sargent) Eggleston
 +
|rank=variety
 
}}
 
}}
 
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae;Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae;Crataegus;Crataegus sect. Coccineae;Crataegus (sect. Coccineae) ser. Rotundifoliae;Crataegus chrysocarpa;Crataegus chrysocarpa var. blanchardii
 
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae;Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae;Crataegus;Crataegus sect. Coccineae;Crataegus (sect. Coccineae) ser. Rotundifoliae;Crataegus chrysocarpa;Crataegus chrysocarpa var. blanchardii
Line 35: Line 37:
 
|elevation=10–200 m
 
|elevation=10–200 m
 
|distribution=Que.;Minn.;N.Y.;Vt.
 
|distribution=Que.;Minn.;N.Y.;Vt.
|discussion=<p>Variety blanchardii is usually like <i></i></i>var.<i><i> chrysocarpa</i>, but with 20 pink anthers; it ranges from Minnesota and Quebec to Vermont and New York. Eggleston perhaps combined it under <i>Crataegus irrasa</i> because of its leaves being (in specimens seen by him) more like <i>C. irrasa</i> in shape and size than those of <i>C. chrysocarpa</i>. The type material, however, is like <i>C. chrysocarpa</i> in these features.</p>
+
|discussion=<p>Variety blanchardii is usually like <i></i>var.<i> chrysocarpa</i>, but with 20 pink anthers; it ranges from Minnesota and Quebec to Vermont and New York. Eggleston perhaps combined it under <i>Crataegus irrasa</i> because of its leaves being (in specimens seen by him) more like <i>C. irrasa</i> in shape and size than those of <i>C. chrysocarpa</i>. The type material, however, is like <i>C. chrysocarpa</i> in these features.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 44: Line 46:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Crataegus chrysocarpa var. blanchardii
 
name=Crataegus chrysocarpa var. blanchardii
|author=
 
 
|authority=(Sargent) J. B. Phipps
 
|authority=(Sargent) J. B. Phipps
 
|rank=variety
 
|rank=variety
Line 59: Line 60:
 
|publication year=2007
 
|publication year=2007
 
|special status=Endemic
 
|special status=Endemic
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_1030.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_1030.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae

Latest revision as of 22:53, 5 November 2020

Shrubs, 20–30 dm. Leaves: blade ovate to rhombic-ovate, base ± cuneate, sinuses: max LII 15–20%, lobe apex acute, veins 3–5 per side, abaxial surface glabrous or veins hairy, adaxial appressed-scabrous, glabrescent. Inflorescences: branches pubescent. Flowers 15–20 mm diam.; hypanthium pubescent; stamens 20, anthers pink. Pomes red, suborbicular, 8–10 mm diam., glabrous.


Phenology: Flowering May; fruiting Sep–Oct.
Habitat: Open brush
Elevation: 10–200 m

Discussion

Variety blanchardii is usually like var. chrysocarpa, but with 20 pink anthers; it ranges from Minnesota and Quebec to Vermont and New York. Eggleston perhaps combined it under Crataegus irrasa because of its leaves being (in specimens seen by him) more like C. irrasa in shape and size than those of C. chrysocarpa. The type material, however, is like C. chrysocarpa in these features.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.