Difference between revisions of "Celosia cristata"
Sp. Pl. 1: 205. 1753.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|place=1: 205. 1753 | |place=1: 205. 1753 | ||
|year=1753 | |year=1753 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=I | ||
| + | |label=Introduced | ||
}} | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
| Line 27: | Line 31: | ||
|elevation=0-1000 m | |elevation=0-1000 m | ||
|distribution=Ala.;Conn.;D.C.;Kans.;La.;Mo.;N.C.;Ohio;R.I.;Tenn.;Vt.;West Indies. | |distribution=Ala.;Conn.;D.C.;Kans.;La.;Mo.;N.C.;Ohio;R.I.;Tenn.;Vt.;West Indies. | ||
| + | |introduced=true | ||
|discussion=<p>In this treatment, <i>Celosia cristata</i>, the cultivated cockscomb, is considered a species separate from <i>C. argentea</i>, its likely wild progenitor; however, it is often treated as an infraspecific entity (variety or form) of the latter. The former is a tetraploid; the latter, an octoploid, although a tetraploid race of <i>C. argentea</i> is known in India (T. N. Khoshoo and M. Pal 1973). Convincing evidence has been presented for recognizing this cytologically and morphologically distinct race as a separate species (W. F. Grant 1961, 1962). <i>Celosia cristata</i> is known only in cultivation or as an escape from cultivation.</p> | |discussion=<p>In this treatment, <i>Celosia cristata</i>, the cultivated cockscomb, is considered a species separate from <i>C. argentea</i>, its likely wild progenitor; however, it is often treated as an infraspecific entity (variety or form) of the latter. The former is a tetraploid; the latter, an octoploid, although a tetraploid race of <i>C. argentea</i> is known in India (T. N. Khoshoo and M. Pal 1973). Convincing evidence has been presented for recognizing this cytologically and morphologically distinct race as a separate species (W. F. Grant 1961, 1962). <i>Celosia cristata</i> is known only in cultivation or as an escape from cultivation.</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
| Line 50: | Line 55: | ||
|publication title=Sp. Pl. | |publication title=Sp. Pl. | ||
|publication year=1753 | |publication year=1753 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Introduced |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_805.xml |
|genus=Celosia | |genus=Celosia | ||
|species=Celosia cristata | |species=Celosia cristata | ||
Latest revision as of 22:00, 5 November 2020
Herbs, annual. Stems erect, mostly 0.3–1 m, glabrous. Leaves: petiole 1–3 cm; blade unlobed, variable, mostly lanceolate or ovate, 8–15 × 1–8 cm, base tapering, apex long-acuminate. Inflorescences variously fasciated, dense, crested or plumose. Flowers: tepals pink, red, yellow, purple, or white, faintly 3-veined at base, 5–8 mm, scarious; style elongate, 3–4 mm; stigmas 3. Utricles 3–4 mm. Seeds 6–10, 1.5 mm diam., faintly reticulate, shiny. 2n = 72.
Phenology: Flowering late summer–fall.
Habitat: Trash dumps, waste places
Elevation: 0-1000 m
Distribution
Introduced; Ala., Conn., D.C., Kans., La., Mo., N.C., Ohio, R.I., Tenn., Vt., West Indies.
Discussion
In this treatment, Celosia cristata, the cultivated cockscomb, is considered a species separate from C. argentea, its likely wild progenitor; however, it is often treated as an infraspecific entity (variety or form) of the latter. The former is a tetraploid; the latter, an octoploid, although a tetraploid race of C. argentea is known in India (T. N. Khoshoo and M. Pal 1973). Convincing evidence has been presented for recognizing this cytologically and morphologically distinct race as a separate species (W. F. Grant 1961, 1962). Celosia cristata is known only in cultivation or as an escape from cultivation.
Selected References
None.