Difference between revisions of "Carex laxiculmis var. copulata"
Rhodora 8: 183. 1906.
IllustratedEndemic
Basionym: Carex digitalis var. copulata L. H. Bailey Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 1: 47. 1889
Synonyms: Carex ×copulata (L. H. Bailey) Mackenzie
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|year=1906 | |year=1906 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status |
| + | |code=F | ||
| + | |label=Illustrated | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=E | ||
| + | |label=Endemic | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | ||
|name=Carex digitalis var. copulata | |name=Carex digitalis var. copulata | ||
|authority=L. H. Bailey | |authority=L. H. Bailey | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
| + | |publication_title=Mem. Torrey Bot. Club | ||
| + | |publication_place=1: 47. 1889 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Carex ×copulata | |name=Carex ×copulata | ||
|authority=(L. H. Bailey) Mackenzie | |authority=(L. H. Bailey) Mackenzie | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Cyperaceae;Carex;Carex sect. Careyanae;Carex laxiculmis;Carex laxiculmis var. copulata | |hierarchy=Cyperaceae;Carex;Carex sect. Careyanae;Carex laxiculmis;Carex laxiculmis var. copulata | ||
| Line 29: | Line 40: | ||
|elevation=0–1000 m | |elevation=0–1000 m | ||
|distribution=Ont.;Ala.;Ark.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Ky.;Mich.;Mo.;N.C.;Ohio;Tenn.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis. | |distribution=Ont.;Ala.;Ark.;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Ky.;Mich.;Mo.;N.C.;Ohio;Tenn.;Va.;W.Va.;Wis. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Carex laxiculmis var. copulata has been treated as a variety of C. digitalis or C. laxiculmis, as a distinct species, and as a hybrid between C. digitalis and C. laxiculmis. Regular pairing during metaphase-I indicates that C. laxiculmis var. copulata is not a by-product of hybridization (R. F. C. Naczi 1999). In lateral spikes, a proximal sterile scale or scale subtending a staminate flower clearly places the affinity of this variety with C. laxiculmis rather than C. digitalis (C. T. Bryson 1980).</p> | + | |discussion=<p><i>Carex laxiculmis </i>var.<i> copulata</i> has been treated as a variety of <i>C. digitalis</i> or <i>C. laxiculmis</i>, as a distinct species, and as a hybrid between <i>C. digitalis</i> and <i>C. laxiculmis</i>. Regular pairing during metaphase-I indicates that <i>C. laxiculmis </i>var.<i> copulata</i> is not a by-product of hybridization (R. F. C. Naczi 1999). In lateral spikes, a proximal sterile scale or scale subtending a staminate flower clearly places the affinity of this variety with <i>C. laxiculmis</i> rather than <i>C. digitalis</i> (C. T. Bryson 1980).</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 38: | Line 49: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Carex laxiculmis var. copulata | name=Carex laxiculmis var. copulata | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(L. H. Bailey) Fernald | |authority=(L. H. Bailey) Fernald | ||
|rank=variety | |rank=variety | ||
| Line 52: | Line 62: | ||
|publication title=Rhodora | |publication title=Rhodora | ||
|publication year=1906 | |publication year=1906 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Illustrated;Endemic |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V23/V23_822.xml |
|genus=Carex | |genus=Carex | ||
|section=Carex sect. Careyanae | |section=Carex sect. Careyanae | ||
Latest revision as of 20:43, 5 November 2020
Leaves usually bright green; widest blade 5.3–8.3 mm wide. Longest staminate spike 6–20(–23) mm.
Phenology: Fruiting spring–early summer.
Habitat: Low, wet, deciduous or mixed deciduous-evergreen forests, mesic slopes to along edges of springs, seeps, and streams, usually clay soils
Elevation: 0–1000 m
Distribution
Ont., Ala., Ark., Ill., Ind., Iowa, Ky., Mich., Mo., N.C., Ohio, Tenn., Va., W.Va., Wis.
Discussion
Carex laxiculmis var. copulata has been treated as a variety of C. digitalis or C. laxiculmis, as a distinct species, and as a hybrid between C. digitalis and C. laxiculmis. Regular pairing during metaphase-I indicates that C. laxiculmis var. copulata is not a by-product of hybridization (R. F. C. Naczi 1999). In lateral spikes, a proximal sterile scale or scale subtending a staminate flower clearly places the affinity of this variety with C. laxiculmis rather than C. digitalis (C. T. Bryson 1980).
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
None.