Difference between revisions of "Sporobolus compositus var. compositus"
Synonyms: Sporobolus asper var. hookeri unknown Sporobolus undefined var. asper unknown
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 25. Treatment on page 122.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|name=Sporobolus asper var. hookeri | |name=Sporobolus asper var. hookeri | ||
|authority=unknown | |authority=unknown | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Sporobolus undefined var. asper | |name=Sporobolus undefined var. asper | ||
|authority=unknown | |authority=unknown | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
-->{{Treatment/Body | -->{{Treatment/Body | ||
|distribution=Ariz.;Oreg.;Wash.;Del.;Wis.;W.Va.;Minn.;N.Dak.;Nebr.;Okla.;S.Dak.;Wyo.;N.J.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Mass.;R.I.;La.;Tenn.;N.Y.;Pa.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Md.;Mich.;N.C.;Ohio;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Colo.;Ala.;Ark.;Iowa;Idaho;N.Mex.;Maine;Tex.;Kans.;Mont.;Mo.;Miss. | |distribution=Ariz.;Oreg.;Wash.;Del.;Wis.;W.Va.;Minn.;N.Dak.;Nebr.;Okla.;S.Dak.;Wyo.;N.J.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Mass.;R.I.;La.;Tenn.;N.Y.;Pa.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Md.;Mich.;N.C.;Ohio;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Colo.;Ala.;Ark.;Iowa;Idaho;N.Mex.;Maine;Tex.;Kans.;Mont.;Mo.;Miss. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Sporobolus compositus var. compositus is the most widespread of the three varieties, being found through¬out most of the range shown for the species, but not in South Carolina or Florida.</p> | + | |discussion=<p><i>Sporobolus compositus </i>var.<i> compositus</i> is the most widespread of the three varieties, being found through¬out most of the range shown for the species, but not in South Carolina or Florida.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V25/V25_196.xml |
|subfamily=Poaceae subfam. Chloridoideae | |subfamily=Poaceae subfam. Chloridoideae | ||
|tribe=Poaceae tribe Cynodonteae | |tribe=Poaceae tribe Cynodonteae | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 18 September 2019
Plants not rhizomatous. Culms stout, 2-5 mm thick. Uppermost sheaths usually 2.6-6 mm wide. Panicles with 30-90 spikelets per cm2 when pressed. Fruits 1-1.8 mm.
Distribution
Ariz., Oreg., Wash., Del., Wis., W.Va., Minn., N.Dak., Nebr., Okla., S.Dak., Wyo., N.J., B.C., Man., N.B., Ont., Que., Conn., Mass., R.I., La., Tenn., N.Y., Pa., Ill., Ind., Ky., Md., Mich., N.C., Ohio, Utah, Vt., Va., Colo., Ala., Ark., Iowa, Idaho, N.Mex., Maine, Tex., Kans., Mont., Mo., Miss.
Discussion
Sporobolus compositus var. compositus is the most widespread of the three varieties, being found through¬out most of the range shown for the species, but not in South Carolina or Florida.
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
None.
... more about "Sporobolus compositus var. compositus"
Ariz. +, Oreg. +, Wash. +, Del. +, Wis. +, W.Va. +, Minn. +, N.Dak. +, Nebr. +, Okla. +, S.Dak. +, Wyo. +, N.J. +, B.C. +, Man. +, N.B. +, Ont. +, Que. +, Conn. +, Mass. +, R.I. +, La. +, Tenn. +, N.Y. +, Pa. +, Ill. +, Ind. +, Ky. +, Md. +, Mich. +, N.C. +, Ohio +, Utah +, Vt. +, Va. +, Colo. +, Ala. +, Ark. +, Iowa +, Idaho +, N.Mex. +, Maine +, Tex. +, Kans. +, Mont. +, Mo. + and Miss. +
Present +
Endemic +
Sporobolus compositus var. compositus +
Sporobolus compositus +
variety +