Talk:Crepis pulchra

Revision as of 17:24, 28 May 2021 by RevisionBot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Adding {{TalkChanges|Original=Introduced; Ont., Ala., Ark., D.C., Ga., Ill., Ind., Ky., La., Md., Miss., Mo., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va., W.Va., Eurasia. |ChangedTo=Introduced; Ont., Al)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Change made
Original Introduced; Ont., Ala., Ark., D.C., Ga., Ill., Ind., Ky., La., Md., Miss., Mo., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va., W.Va., Eurasia.
Changed to Introduced; Ont., Ala., Ark., Calif., D.C., Ga., Ill., Ind., Ky., La., Md., Miss., Mo., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va., W.Va., Eurasia.
Location Distribution statement and map
Category Distribution
Reason error in text; author David Bogler annotated specimen UC1746479 (collected in Napa Co., Calif.) as Crepis pulchra Linnaeus.
Volume 19
Authority John Strother, 15 Sept 2020
Fixed in FNA SMW yes
Comments no