Difference between revisions of "Holozonia"
Bull Torrey Bot. Club 9: 122. 1882.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
--><p><i>Holozonia</i> has been treated as congeneric with <i>Hemizonia</i> and with <i>Lagophylla</i>. Like <i>Lagophylla</i>, <i>Holozonia</i> has functionally staminate disc florets, cup-shaped glands, and obcompressed cypselae, each completely or mostly invested by a phyllary. Additional morphologic considerations and biosystematic studies led W. C. Thompson (1983) to reject the hypothesis of a close relationship between <i>Holozonia</i> and <i>Lagophylla</i>. Molecular phylogenetic data are in keeping with a closer relationship of <i>Holozonia</i> to other continental tarweeds with white corollas and x = 14 (i.e., <i>Blepharizonia</i> and <i>Hemizonia</i>), than to <i>Lagophylla</i> (S. Carlquist et al. 2003).</p> | --><p><i>Holozonia</i> has been treated as congeneric with <i>Hemizonia</i> and with <i>Lagophylla</i>. Like <i>Lagophylla</i>, <i>Holozonia</i> has functionally staminate disc florets, cup-shaped glands, and obcompressed cypselae, each completely or mostly invested by a phyllary. Additional morphologic considerations and biosystematic studies led W. C. Thompson (1983) to reject the hypothesis of a close relationship between <i>Holozonia</i> and <i>Lagophylla</i>. Molecular phylogenetic data are in keeping with a closer relationship of <i>Holozonia</i> to other continental tarweeds with white corollas and x = 14 (i.e., <i>Blepharizonia</i> and <i>Hemizonia</i>), than to <i>Lagophylla</i> (S. Carlquist et al. 2003).</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
| − | |references= | + | |references= |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
| Line 42: | Line 39: | ||
|family=Asteraceae | |family=Asteraceae | ||
|distribution=Calif. | |distribution=Calif. | ||
| − | |reference= | + | |reference=None |
|publication title=Bull Torrey Bot. Club | |publication title=Bull Torrey Bot. Club | ||
|publication year=1882 | |publication year=1882 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/eaa6e58056e40c9ef614d8f47aea294977a1a5e9/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_721.xml |
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | |tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | ||
|subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Madiinae | |subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Madiinae | ||
Revision as of 19:38, 16 December 2019
Perennials, 30–150 cm (rhizomatous). Stems (aerial) ± erect. Leaves mostly cauline; proximal opposite (basally connate), distal alternate; sessile; blades lanceolate to linear, margins entire, faces hirsute and (distal leaves) glandular-hirtellous (glands cup-shaped). Heads radiate, borne singly or in loose, corymbiform arrays (peduncles filiform). Peduncular bracts: pit-glands, tack-glands, and/or spines 0. Involucres ± obconic or turbinate, 2–4+ mm diam. Receptacles flat to convex, glabrous or setulose, paleate (paleae falling, in 1 series between rays and discs, connate). Phyllaries 4–10 in 1 series (each mostly or wholly enveloping a ray ovary, ± lance-linear, herbaceous, abaxially hirsute, sometimes glandular-hirtellous, glands cup-shaped). Ray florets 4–10, pistillate, fertile; corollas whitish (abaxially purplish-veined). Disc florets 9–28, functionally staminate; corollas white (pubescent), tubes shorter than funnelform throats, lobes 5, deltate (anthers ± dark purple; styles glabrous proximal to branches). Cypselae (black) obcompressed, ± clavate (basal attachments centered, apices beakless, areolae broadly cupulate, faces glabrous); pappi (rays) 0 or coroniform (0.1–0.3 mm), or (discs) 0 or (readily falling) of 1–5 subulate scales. x = 14.
Discussion
Species 1.
Holozonia has been treated as congeneric with Hemizonia and with Lagophylla. Like Lagophylla, Holozonia has functionally staminate disc florets, cup-shaped glands, and obcompressed cypselae, each completely or mostly invested by a phyllary. Additional morphologic considerations and biosystematic studies led W. C. Thompson (1983) to reject the hypothesis of a close relationship between Holozonia and Lagophylla. Molecular phylogenetic data are in keeping with a closer relationship of Holozonia to other continental tarweeds with white corollas and x = 14 (i.e., Blepharizonia and Hemizonia), than to Lagophylla (S. Carlquist et al. 2003).
Selected References
None.