Difference between revisions of "Ambrosia psilostachya"
in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr. 5: 526. 1836.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. californica | |name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. californica | ||
|authority=(Rydberg) S. F. Blake | |authority=(Rydberg) S. F. Blake | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. coronopifolia | |name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. coronopifolia | ||
|authority=(Torrey & A. Gray) Farwell | |authority=(Torrey & A. Gray) Farwell | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. lindheimeriana | |name=Ambrosia psilostachya var. lindheimeriana | ||
|authority=(Scheele) Blankinship | |authority=(Scheele) Blankinship | ||
− | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym |
|name=Ambrosia rugelii | |name=Ambrosia rugelii | ||
|authority=unknown | |authority=unknown | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
|elevation=0–2200 m | |elevation=0–2200 m | ||
|distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Ala.;Ariz.;Ark.;Calif.;Colo.;Fla.;Ga.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;La.;Maine;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Tex.;Utah;Vt.;Wash.;Wis.;Wyo.;Mexico (Baja California;Chihuahua;Coahuila). | |distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Ala.;Ariz.;Ark.;Calif.;Colo.;Fla.;Ga.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;La.;Maine;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Tex.;Utah;Vt.;Wash.;Wis.;Wyo.;Mexico (Baja California;Chihuahua;Coahuila). | ||
− | |discussion=<p>Hybrids between Ambrosia psilostachya and A. artemisiifolia have been called A. ×intergradiens W. H. Wagner. Some botanists consider the type of A. cumanensis Kunth (1818) to be conspecific with that of A. psilostachya.</p> | + | |discussion=<p>Hybrids between <i>Ambrosia psilostachya</i> and <i>A. artemisiifolia</i> have been called A. ×intergradiens W. H. Wagner. Some botanists consider the type of A. cumanensis Kunth (1818) to be conspecific with that of <i>A. psilostachya</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
|publication year=1836 | |publication year=1836 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
− | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_25.xml |
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | |tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | ||
|subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Ambrosiinae | |subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Ambrosiinae |
Revision as of 16:33, 18 September 2019
Perennials, 10–60(–100+) cm. Stems erect. Leaves proximally opposite, distally alternate; petioles 0–25 mm (often ± winged); blades deltate to lanceolate, 20–60(–140) × 8–35(–50+) mm, pinnately toothed to 1-pinnately lobed, bases cuneate to truncate, ultimate margins entire or toothed, abaxial and adaxial faces hirsutulous to strigose and gland-dotted. Pistillate heads clustered, proximal to staminates; florets 1. Staminate heads: peduncles 0.5–2 mm; involucres obliquely cup-shaped, 2–4(–5) mm diam., hirsutulous; florets 5–15(–30+). Burs: bodies ± obpyramidal to globose, 2–3 mm, hirsutulous, spines or tubercles 0 or 1–6, mostly distal, stoutly conic to acerose, (0.1–)0.5–1 mm, tips straight. 2n = 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, 63, 72, 100–104, 108, 144.
Phenology: Flowering Jul–Oct(–Dec).
Habitat: Disturbed sites, often wet, alkaline, clay soils
Elevation: 0–2200 m
Distribution
Alta., B.C., Man., N.S., Ont., P.E.I., Que., Sask., Ala., Ariz., Ark., Calif., Colo., Fla., Ga., Idaho, Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., La., Maine, Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.H., N.Mex., N.Y., N.C., N.Dak., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., S.C., S.Dak., Tenn., Tex., Utah, Vt., Wash., Wis., Wyo., Mexico (Baja California, Chihuahua, Coahuila).
Discussion
Hybrids between Ambrosia psilostachya and A. artemisiifolia have been called A. ×intergradiens W. H. Wagner. Some botanists consider the type of A. cumanensis Kunth (1818) to be conspecific with that of A. psilostachya.
Selected References
None.