Difference between revisions of "Drymocallis cuneifolia var. cuneifolia"
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 295.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
− | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_479.xml |
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | |subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | ||
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae | |tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae |
Revision as of 18:17, 18 September 2019
Stems 2–4.5 dm. Basal leaves 5–15 cm, leaflet pairs (2–)3–4(–5); terminal leaflet broadly cuneate-flabellate, 1–2.5(–3.5) cm. Epicalyx bractlets linear to narrowly elliptic, 0.8–2 × 0.3–0.5 mm. Achenes 1–1.2 mm.
Phenology: Flowering Jun–Aug(–Sep).
Habitat: Stream edges in riparian scrub
Elevation: 1800–2300 m
Discussion
Of conservation concern.
Variety cuneifolia is currently known from only two populations on the north face of the San Bernardino Mountains, San Bernardino County.
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
None.