Difference between revisions of "Poa arctica subsp. arctica"
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
-->{{Treatment/Body | -->{{Treatment/Body | ||
|discussion=<p><i>Poa arctica </i>subsp.<i> arctica</i> is polymorphic and circumpolar. It grows in alpine and tundra habitats as far south as Wheeler Peak, New Mexico. Bulbiferous plants are known from alpine habitats in Alaska and British Columbia.</p><!-- | |discussion=<p><i>Poa arctica </i>subsp.<i> arctica</i> is polymorphic and circumpolar. It grows in alpine and tundra habitats as far south as Wheeler Peak, New Mexico. Bulbiferous plants are known from alpine habitats in Alaska and British Columbia.</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p><i>Poa arctica </i>subsp.<i> arctica</i> has tougher leaves, and is less densely hairy between the lemma veins and palea keels, than <i></i>subsp.<i> aperta</i>. It often grows with <i></i>subsp.<i> lanata</i>, but can be distinguished by its smaller and, usually, more numerous spikelets and narrower leaves. Paleas that are glabrous between the keels are frequent in plants from the Rocky Mountains. Such plants have been called P. longipila Nash, but do not merit recognition. Hulten (1942) recognized several variants within <i></i>subsp.<i> arctica</i>; they are of ecotypic significance at best.</p> | + | --><p><i>Poa arctica </i>subsp.<i> arctica</i> has tougher leaves, and is less densely hairy between the lemma veins and palea keels, than <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> aperta</i>. It often grows with <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> lanata</i>, but can be distinguished by its smaller and, usually, more numerous spikelets and narrower leaves. Paleas that are glabrous between the keels are frequent in plants from the Rocky Mountains. Such plants have been called P. longipila Nash, but do not merit recognition. Hulten (1942) recognized several variants within <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> arctica</i>; they are of ecotypic significance at best.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
|publication year= | |publication year= | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V24/V24_744.xml |
|subfamily=Poaceae subfam. Pooideae | |subfamily=Poaceae subfam. Pooideae | ||
|tribe=Poaceae tribe Poeae | |tribe=Poaceae tribe Poeae | ||
Revision as of 19:16, 24 September 2019
Plants usually loosely, sometimes densely, tufted, rhizomatous, rhizomes short or long, well developed. Ligules (1)2-4 mm, obtuse to acute; blades 1.5-2.5(3) mm wide, flat or folded, thin and soon withering, flag leaf blades 0.7-5.5 cm. Panicles lax to erect, open; branches ascending or widely spreading, sinuous and flexuous to fairly straight, smooth or sparsely scabrous, proximal branches 2/5 – 3/5 the panicle length. Spikelets (3.5)4.5-6(7) mm, infrequently bulbiferous; rachilla internodes usually glabrous, infrequently sparsely softly puberulent to long-villous; calluses sparsely to copiously webbed; lemmas (2.7)3-4.5 mm; palea keels puberulent to long-villous at midlength, intercostal regions usually hairy, sometimes glabrous; anthers usually fully developed, except in the high arctic. 2n = 56, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 82, ca. 83, 84, 85, 88, 106.
Discussion
Poa arctica subsp. arctica is polymorphic and circumpolar. It grows in alpine and tundra habitats as far south as Wheeler Peak, New Mexico. Bulbiferous plants are known from alpine habitats in Alaska and British Columbia.
Poa arctica subsp. arctica has tougher leaves, and is less densely hairy between the lemma veins and palea keels, than subsp. aperta. It often grows with subsp. lanata, but can be distinguished by its smaller and, usually, more numerous spikelets and narrower leaves. Paleas that are glabrous between the keels are frequent in plants from the Rocky Mountains. Such plants have been called P. longipila Nash, but do not merit recognition. Hulten (1942) recognized several variants within subsp. arctica; they are of ecotypic significance at best.
Selected References
None.