Difference between revisions of "Sporobolus compositus var. compositus"

Synonyms: Sporobolus asper var. hookeri Sporobolus undefined var. asper
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 25. Treatment on page 122.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
imported>Volume Importer
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Treatment/ID
 
{{Treatment/ID
 
|accepted_name=Sporobolus compositus var. compositus
 
|accepted_name=Sporobolus compositus var. compositus
|accepted_authority=unknown
+
|accepted_authority=
 
|publications=
 
|publications=
 
|basionyms=
 
|basionyms=
 
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=Sporobolus asper var. hookeri
 
|name=Sporobolus asper var. hookeri
|authority=unknown
+
|authority=
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=variety
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=Sporobolus undefined var. asper
 
|name=Sporobolus undefined var. asper
|authority=unknown
+
|authority=
 +
|rank=variety
 
}}
 
}}
 
|hierarchy=Poaceae;Poaceae subfam. Chloridoideae;Poaceae tribe Cynodonteae;Sporobolus;Sporobolus compositus;Sporobolus compositus var. compositus
 
|hierarchy=Poaceae;Poaceae subfam. Chloridoideae;Poaceae tribe Cynodonteae;Sporobolus;Sporobolus compositus;Sporobolus compositus var. compositus
Line 22: Line 24:
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
 
|distribution=Ariz.;Oreg.;Wash.;Del.;Wis.;W.Va.;Minn.;N.Dak.;Nebr.;Okla.;S.Dak.;Wyo.;N.J.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Mass.;R.I.;La.;Tenn.;N.Y.;Pa.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Md.;Mich.;N.C.;Ohio;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Colo.;Ala.;Ark.;Iowa;Idaho;N.Mex.;Maine;Tex.;Kans.;Mont.;Mo.;Miss.
 
|distribution=Ariz.;Oreg.;Wash.;Del.;Wis.;W.Va.;Minn.;N.Dak.;Nebr.;Okla.;S.Dak.;Wyo.;N.J.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Mass.;R.I.;La.;Tenn.;N.Y.;Pa.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Md.;Mich.;N.C.;Ohio;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Colo.;Ala.;Ark.;Iowa;Idaho;N.Mex.;Maine;Tex.;Kans.;Mont.;Mo.;Miss.
|discussion=<p>Sporobolus compositus var. compositus is the most widespread of the three varieties, being found through¬out most of the range shown for the species, but not in South Carolina or Florida.</p>
+
|discussion=<p><i>Sporobolus compositus </i>var.<i> compositus</i> is the most widespread of the three varieties, being found through¬out most of the range shown for the species, but not in South Carolina or Florida.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 31: Line 33:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Sporobolus compositus var. compositus
 
name=Sporobolus compositus var. compositus
|author=
+
|authority=
|authority=unknown
 
 
|rank=variety
 
|rank=variety
 
|parent rank=species
 
|parent rank=species
Line 38: Line 39:
 
|basionyms=
 
|basionyms=
 
|family=Poaceae
 
|family=Poaceae
 +
|illustrator=Linda A. Vorobik;Hana Pazdírková
 +
|illustration copyright=Utah State University
 
|distribution=Ariz.;Oreg.;Wash.;Del.;Wis.;W.Va.;Minn.;N.Dak.;Nebr.;Okla.;S.Dak.;Wyo.;N.J.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Mass.;R.I.;La.;Tenn.;N.Y.;Pa.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Md.;Mich.;N.C.;Ohio;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Colo.;Ala.;Ark.;Iowa;Idaho;N.Mex.;Maine;Tex.;Kans.;Mont.;Mo.;Miss.
 
|distribution=Ariz.;Oreg.;Wash.;Del.;Wis.;W.Va.;Minn.;N.Dak.;Nebr.;Okla.;S.Dak.;Wyo.;N.J.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Ont.;Que.;Conn.;Mass.;R.I.;La.;Tenn.;N.Y.;Pa.;Ill.;Ind.;Ky.;Md.;Mich.;N.C.;Ohio;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Colo.;Ala.;Ark.;Iowa;Idaho;N.Mex.;Maine;Tex.;Kans.;Mont.;Mo.;Miss.
 
|reference=None
 
|reference=None
Line 43: Line 46:
 
|publication year=
 
|publication year=
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V25/V25_196.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/200273ad09963decb8fc72550212de541d86569d/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V25/V25_196.xml
 
|subfamily=Poaceae subfam. Chloridoideae
 
|subfamily=Poaceae subfam. Chloridoideae
 
|tribe=Poaceae tribe Cynodonteae
 
|tribe=Poaceae tribe Cynodonteae

Latest revision as of 17:58, 11 May 2021

Plants not rhizomatous. Culms stout, 2-5 mm thick. Uppermost sheaths usually 2.6-6 mm wide. Panicles with 30-90 spikelets per cm2 when pressed. Fruits 1-1.8 mm.

Distribution

Ariz., Oreg., Wash., Del., Wis., W.Va., Minn., N.Dak., Nebr., Okla., S.Dak., Wyo., N.J., B.C., Man., N.B., Ont., Que., Conn., Mass., R.I., La., Tenn., N.Y., Pa., Ill., Ind., Ky., Md., Mich., N.C., Ohio, Utah, Vt., Va., Colo., Ala., Ark., Iowa, Idaho, N.Mex., Maine, Tex., Kans., Mont., Mo., Miss.

Discussion

Sporobolus compositus var. compositus is the most widespread of the three varieties, being found through¬out most of the range shown for the species, but not in South Carolina or Florida.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
Paul M. Peterson +, Stephan L. Hatch +  and Alan S. Weakley +
unknown +
Ariz. +, Oreg. +, Wash. +, Del. +, Wis. +, W.Va. +, Minn. +, N.Dak. +, Nebr. +, Okla. +, S.Dak. +, Wyo. +, N.J. +, B.C. +, Man. +, N.B. +, Ont. +, Que. +, Conn. +, Mass. +, R.I. +, La. +, Tenn. +, N.Y. +, Pa. +, Ill. +, Ind. +, Ky. +, Md. +, Mich. +, N.C. +, Ohio +, Utah +, Vt. +, Va. +, Colo. +, Ala. +, Ark. +, Iowa +, Idaho +, N.Mex. +, Maine +, Tex. +, Kans. +, Mont. +, Mo. +  and Miss. +
Sporobolus asper var. hookeri +  and Sporobolus undefined var. asper +
Sporobolus compositus var. compositus +
Sporobolus compositus +
variety +