Difference between revisions of "Chamaerhodos erecta"
in C. F. von Ledebour, Fl. Altaica 1: 430. 1829.
Illustrated
Basionym: Sibbaldia erecta Linnaeus Sp. Pl. 1: 284. 1753
Synonyms: Chamaerhodos erecta subsp. nuttallii (Pickering ex Rydberg) Hultén C. erecta var. parviflora (Nuttall) C. L. Hitchcock C. nuttallii
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 280.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Treatment/ID | {{Treatment/ID | ||
|accepted_name=Chamaerhodos erecta | |accepted_name=Chamaerhodos erecta | ||
| − | |accepted_authority=(Linnaeus) Bunge | + | |accepted_authority=(Linnaeus) Bunge |
|publications={{Treatment/Publication | |publications={{Treatment/Publication | ||
|title=in C. F. von Ledebour, Fl. Altaica | |title=in C. F. von Ledebour, Fl. Altaica | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
|code=F | |code=F | ||
| − | |label= | + | |label=Illustrated |
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Sibbaldia erecta | |name=Sibbaldia erecta | ||
|authority=Linnaeus | |authority=Linnaeus | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
| + | |publication_title=Sp. Pl. | ||
| + | |publication_place=1: 284. 1753 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Chamaerhodos erecta subsp. nuttallii | |name=Chamaerhodos erecta subsp. nuttallii | ||
|authority=(Pickering ex Rydberg) Hultén | |authority=(Pickering ex Rydberg) Hultén | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=subspecies |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=C. erecta var. parviflora | |name=C. erecta var. parviflora | ||
|authority=(Nuttall) C. L. Hitchcock | |authority=(Nuttall) C. L. Hitchcock | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=variety |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=C. nuttallii | |name=C. nuttallii | ||
| − | |authority= | + | |authority= |
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae;Chamaerhodos;Chamaerhodos erecta | |hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae;Chamaerhodos;Chamaerhodos erecta | ||
| Line 39: | Line 45: | ||
|elevation=300–3200 m | |elevation=300–3200 m | ||
|distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.W.T.;Ont.;Sask.;Yukon;Alaska;Colo.;Mich.;Minn.;Mont.;N.Dak.;S.Dak.;Utah.;Wyo.;Asia (Mongolia;Russian Far East;Siberia). | |distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.W.T.;Ont.;Sask.;Yukon;Alaska;Colo.;Mich.;Minn.;Mont.;N.Dak.;S.Dak.;Utah.;Wyo.;Asia (Mongolia;Russian Far East;Siberia). | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>No clear distinction could be made among infraspecific taxa of Chamaerhodos erecta. Purportedly distinguishing characters, for example petal length relative to sepal length, vary throughout the range of the species. Stems may be in tufts, single or multiple (one North Dakota specimen exhibited leafy tufts with ten branches from the base). Most often, specimens are single-stemmed, branching distal to the middle, and producing flat-topped inflorescences.</p> | + | |discussion=<p>No clear distinction could be made among infraspecific taxa of <i>Chamaerhodos erecta</i>. Purportedly distinguishing characters, for example petal length relative to sepal length, vary throughout the range of the species. Stems may be in tufts, single or multiple (one North Dakota specimen exhibited leafy tufts with ten branches from the base). Most often, specimens are single-stemmed, branching distal to the middle, and producing flat-topped inflorescences.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 48: | Line 54: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Chamaerhodos erecta | name=Chamaerhodos erecta | ||
| − | + | |authority=(Linnaeus) Bunge | |
| − | |authority=(Linnaeus) Bunge | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
|parent rank=genus | |parent rank=genus | ||
| Line 62: | Line 67: | ||
|publication title=in C. F. von Ledebour, Fl. Altaica | |publication title=in C. F. von Ledebour, Fl. Altaica | ||
|publication year=1829 | |publication year=1829 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Illustrated |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_453.xml |
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | |subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | ||
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae | |tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae | ||
Latest revision as of 22:57, 5 November 2020
Leaves: basal petiole to 30 mm; lobes of cauline leaves 5–18 × 0.2–1 mm; surfaces white-hairy, stipitate-glandular, hairs rarely antrorsely barbed. Flowers: sepals 1.8–2.5 mm; petals 1.8–2.5 × 0.5–1.1 mm. 2n = 14.
Phenology: Flowering Jun–Aug; fruiting Jul–Sep.
Habitat: Prairies, dry hilltops, knolls, outcrops, buttes, rocky and sandy soil or gravel, exposed and disturbed sites
Elevation: 300–3200 m
Distribution
Alta., B.C., Man., N.W.T., Ont., Sask., Yukon, Alaska, Colo., Mich., Minn., Mont., N.Dak., S.Dak., Utah., Wyo., Asia (Mongolia, Russian Far East, Siberia).
Discussion
No clear distinction could be made among infraspecific taxa of Chamaerhodos erecta. Purportedly distinguishing characters, for example petal length relative to sepal length, vary throughout the range of the species. Stems may be in tufts, single or multiple (one North Dakota specimen exhibited leafy tufts with ten branches from the base). Most often, specimens are single-stemmed, branching distal to the middle, and producing flat-topped inflorescences.
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
None.