Difference between revisions of "Iris pumila"
Sp. Pl. 1: 38. 1753.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Dwarf iris | |common_names=Dwarf iris | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=I | ||
| + | |label=Introduced | ||
| + | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|synonyms= | |synonyms= | ||
| Line 23: | Line 27: | ||
|habitat=Dry, grassy areas | |habitat=Dry, grassy areas | ||
|distribution=Ill.;Ind.;Mich.;Ohio;c;e Europe. | |distribution=Ill.;Ind.;Mich.;Ohio;c;e Europe. | ||
| + | |introduced=true | ||
|discussion=<p><i>Iris pumila</i> has been shown to be a natural amphidiploid hybrid between I. pseudopumila Boissier & Heldreich and I. attica Tineo, both 2n = 16. Like many other such hybrids, its range of variability is so extensive that many of its forms have been given specific names. In spite of the variability in color and size, it is now recognized as a distinct species. During the past 50 years, it has been crossed repeatedly with several other species, including <i>I. germanica</i> and its mixed progeny, and this has introduced patterns from the tall-bearded iris into the dwarfs, and vice versa. The ranges of flowering season and plant height are now almost continuous from one extreme to the other, and intermediate groups are now recognized.</p><!-- | |discussion=<p><i>Iris pumila</i> has been shown to be a natural amphidiploid hybrid between I. pseudopumila Boissier & Heldreich and I. attica Tineo, both 2n = 16. Like many other such hybrids, its range of variability is so extensive that many of its forms have been given specific names. In spite of the variability in color and size, it is now recognized as a distinct species. During the past 50 years, it has been crossed repeatedly with several other species, including <i>I. germanica</i> and its mixed progeny, and this has introduced patterns from the tall-bearded iris into the dwarfs, and vice versa. The ranges of flowering season and plant height are now almost continuous from one extreme to the other, and intermediate groups are now recognized.</p><!-- | ||
--><p><i>Iris pumila</i> is widely grown in gardens and often persists for years after cultivation around old dwellings and along roadsides. It is thus extremely difficult to document and map its spontaneous occurrence. Although most, if not all, of the modern dwarf irises are of hybrid parentage, a number of herbarium specimens from the nineteenth century seem to represent wild forms of <i>I. pumila</i>.</p> | --><p><i>Iris pumila</i> is widely grown in gardens and often persists for years after cultivation around old dwellings and along roadsides. It is thus extremely difficult to document and map its spontaneous occurrence. Although most, if not all, of the modern dwarf irises are of hybrid parentage, a number of herbarium specimens from the nineteenth century seem to represent wild forms of <i>I. pumila</i>.</p> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 38: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Iris pumila | name=Iris pumila | ||
| − | |||
|authority=Linnaeus | |authority=Linnaeus | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 47: | Line 51: | ||
|publication title=Sp. Pl. | |publication title=Sp. Pl. | ||
|publication year=1753 | |publication year=1753 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Introduced |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V26/V26_763.xml |
|genus=Iris | |genus=Iris | ||
|subgenus=Iris subg. Iris | |subgenus=Iris subg. Iris | ||
Latest revision as of 21:17, 5 November 2020
Rhizomes freely branching, producing dense clumps, 1–1.5 cm diam. Stems absent or not more than 1 cm. Leaves ascending-spreading; blade grayish green, ensiform or slightly falcate, 8–10 cm × 6–15 mm at anthesis, increasing to 15–20 cm in length on innovations after flowering, dying back in autumn, new growth only in spring, glaucous. Inflorescence units 1-flowered, sessile in spathes; spathes 5–10 cm; outer darker green than inner, inner closely shielding floral tube. Flowers: floral tube with 3 purple stripes in line with midrib of petals, slender, 6–10 cm × 2–3 mm, lifting expanded portion of flower out of spathes; sepals yellow, blue, or purple, with yellowish or bluish beard, often with contrasting spot around beard at base of limb, 4–5 × 1.2–2 cm; petals with darker veins near base, rounded-ovate, broader than sepals, 4–5 × 2.2–2.7 cm, narrowing abruptly to brown-veined claw, apex emarginate; ovary rounded-trigonal, ca. 1 cm × 4–5 mm; style crests triangular, margins serrate distally; stigmas rounded on distal margin, margins entire; pedicel absent. Capsules borne on tips of rhizomes at ground level or slightly below, rounded-trigonal, with short portion of dried floral tube forming tip, smooth, 2–3.5 × 1.5–2 cm, dehiscing while green. Seeds usually in 2 rows per locule, light brown, subspherical, 3–5 mm diam., wrinkled. 2n = 30, 31, 32, 36.
Phenology: Flowering late Mar–mid May.
Habitat: Dry, grassy areas
Distribution
Introduced; Ill., Ind., Mich., Ohio, c, e Europe.
Discussion
Iris pumila has been shown to be a natural amphidiploid hybrid between I. pseudopumila Boissier & Heldreich and I. attica Tineo, both 2n = 16. Like many other such hybrids, its range of variability is so extensive that many of its forms have been given specific names. In spite of the variability in color and size, it is now recognized as a distinct species. During the past 50 years, it has been crossed repeatedly with several other species, including I. germanica and its mixed progeny, and this has introduced patterns from the tall-bearded iris into the dwarfs, and vice versa. The ranges of flowering season and plant height are now almost continuous from one extreme to the other, and intermediate groups are now recognized.
Iris pumila is widely grown in gardens and often persists for years after cultivation around old dwellings and along roadsides. It is thus extremely difficult to document and map its spontaneous occurrence. Although most, if not all, of the modern dwarf irises are of hybrid parentage, a number of herbarium specimens from the nineteenth century seem to represent wild forms of I. pumila.
Selected References
None.