Difference between revisions of "Cystopteris fragilis"

(Linnaeus) Bernhardi

Neues J. Bot. 1(2): 27, plate 2, fig. 9. 1805.

Common names: Brittle fern fragile fern cystoptère fragile
Basionym: Polypodium fragile Linnaeus Sp. Pl. 2: 1091. 1753
Synonyms: Cystopteris dickieana Sim Cystopteris fragilis subsp. dickieana (Sim) Hylander
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 2.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
m (Fixed distribution to match printed version.)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|publications={{Treatment/Publication
 
|publications={{Treatment/Publication
 
|title=Neues J. Bot.
 
|title=Neues J. Bot.
|place=1(2): 26, plate 2, fig. 9. 1806
+
|place=1(2): 27, plate 2, fig. 9. 1805
|year=1806
+
|year=1805
 
}}
 
}}
 
|common_names=Brittle fern;fragile fern;cystoptère fragile
 
|common_names=Brittle fern;fragile fern;cystoptère fragile
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym
 
|name=Polypodium fragile
 
|name=Polypodium fragile
 
|authority=Linnaeus
 
|authority=Linnaeus
 +
|rank=species
 +
|publication_title=Sp. Pl.
 +
|publication_place=2: 1091. 1753
 
}}
 
}}
 
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=Cystopteris dickieana
 
|name=Cystopteris dickieana
 
|authority=Sim
 
|authority=Sim
}}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym
+
|rank=species
 +
}} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym
 
|name=Cystopteris fragilis subsp. dickieana
 
|name=Cystopteris fragilis subsp. dickieana
 
|authority=(Sim) Hylander
 
|authority=(Sim) Hylander
 +
|rank=subspecies
 
}}
 
}}
 
|hierarchy=Dryopteridaceae;Cystopteris;Cystopteris fragilis
 
|hierarchy=Dryopteridaceae;Cystopteris;Cystopteris fragilis
Line 26: Line 31:
 
}}<!--
 
}}<!--
  
--><span class="statement" id="st-d0_s0" data-properties="stem growth form or orientation;stem shape;internode height or length or size;petiole base life cycle;hair count"><b>Stems </b>creeping, not cordlike, internodes short, beset with old petiole bases, hairs absent;</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s1" data-properties="scale coloration;scale coloration;scale coloration;scale shape;wall arrangement;wall width;lumina coloration">scales tan to light-brown, lanceolate, radial walls thin, luminae tan.</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s2" data-properties="leaf architecture;leaf arrangement or growth form;leaf some measurement"><b>Leaves </b>monomorphic, clustered at stem apex, to 40 cm, nearly all bearing sori.</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s3" data-properties="petiole coloration;petiole coloration;petiole coloration;petiole coloration;petiole height or length or size;blade variability;base architecture or pubescence"><b>Petiole </b>dark at base, mostly green to straw-colored distally, shorter than or nearly equaling blade, base sparsely scaly.</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s4" data-properties="blade shape;blade shape;blade shape;blade shape;blade width;middle position;apex shape"><b>Blade </b>lanceolate to narrowly elliptic, 1 (–2) -pinnate-pinnatifid, widest at or just below middle, apex acute;</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s5" data-properties="hair count;hair architecture;bulblet count;bulblet architecture">rachis and costae lacking gland-tipped hairs or bulblets;</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s6" data-properties="axil architecture;pinna count;hair architecture">axils of pinnae lacking multicellular, gland-tipped hairs.</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s7" data-properties="pinna orientation;pinna course;margin architecture or shape;margin architecture or shape;margin architecture or shape"><b>Pinnae </b>usually perpendicular to rachis, not curving toward blade apex, margins serrate to sharply dentate;</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s8" data-properties="proximal pinna shape;proximal pinna shape;proximal pinna shape;proximal pinna architecture or shape;pinnule orientation;pinnule size">proximal pinnae pinnatifid to pinnate-pinnatifid, ± equilateral, basiscopic pinnules not enlarged;</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s9" data-properties="pinnule orientation;pinnule architecture;base shape;base shape;base shape;distal pinna shape;distal pinna shape;distal pinna shape">basal basiscopic pinnules sessile, base truncate to obtuse, distal pinnae deltate to ovate.</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s10" data-properties="vein orientation"><b>Veins </b>directed mostly into teeth.</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s11" data-properties="indusium shape;indusium shape;indusium shape;hair architecture"><b>Indusia </b>ovate to lanceolate, without gland-tipped hairs.</span> <span class="statement" id="st-d0_s12" data-properties="spore architecture or shape;spore relief;spore some measurement;2n chromosome count;2n chromosome count"><b>Spores </b>spiny or verrucate, usually 39–60 µm. <b>2n</b> = 168, 252.</span><!--
+
--><span class="statement" id="st-undefined" data-properties=""><b>Stems </b>creeping, not cordlike, internodes short, beset with old petiole bases, hairs absent; scales tan to light brown, lanceolate, radial walls thin, luminae tan. <b>Leaves</b> monomorphic, clustered at stem apex, to 40 cm, nearly all bearing sori. <b>Petiole</b> dark at base, mostly green to straw-colored distally, shorter than or nearly equaling blade, base sparsely scaly. <b>Blade</b> lanceolate to narrowly elliptic, 1(–2)-pinnate-pinnatifid, widest at or just below middle, apex acute; rachis and costae lacking gland-tipped hairs or bulblets; axils of pinnae lacking multicellular, gland-tipped hairs. <b>Pinnae</b> usually perpendicular to rachis, not curving toward blade apex, margins serrate to sharply dentate; proximal pinnae pinnatifid to pinnate-pinnatifid, ± equilateral, basiscopic pinnules not enlarged; basal basiscopic pinnules sessile, base truncate to obtuse, distal pinnae deltate to ovate. <b>Veins</b> directed mostly into teeth. <b>Indusia</b> ovate to lanceolate, without gland-tipped hairs. <b>Spores</b> spiny or verrucate, usually 39–60 µm. <b>2n</b> = 168, 252.</span><!--
  
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
 
-->{{Treatment/Body
 +
|phenology=Sporulating summer–fall.
 
|habitat=Mostly on cliff faces, also in thin soil over rock
 
|habitat=Mostly on cliff faces, also in thin soil over rock
 
|elevation=0–4500 m
 
|elevation=0–4500 m
|distribution=Greenland;St. Pierre and Miquelon;Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld.;N.W.T.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Yukon;Alaska;Calif.;Colo.;Conn.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Maine;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Oreg.;Pa.;S.Dak.;Tex.;Utah;Vt.;Wash.;Wis.;Wyo.;worldwide.
+
|distribution=Greenland;St. Pierre and Miquelon;Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld. and Labr.;N.W.T.;N.S.;Nunavut;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Yukon;Alaska;Calif.;Colo.;Conn.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Maine;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Oreg.;Pa.;S.Dak.;Tex.;Utah;Vt.;Wash.;Wis.;Wyo.;worldwide.
|discussion=<p>Cystopteris fragilis is most often confused with C. tenuis in the east and C. reevesiana in the southwest. Habitat and geography, as well as the morphologic features discussed in the key, usually serve to separate these taxa. For instance, C. fragilis is more likely to be found on cliffs whereas the other species prefer boulders and soil (C. fragilis occurs at higher elevations and/or latitudes than the other species). These distinctions can be confounded when C. fragilis forms hybrids with sympatric species. Sterile pentaploid plants have been discovered where C. fragilis overlaps with C. laurentiana, tetraploid hybrids are likely where C. fragilis occurs with C. tenuis, and triploids may form where C. fragilis is found with C. reevesiana. Even after segregating relatively distinct elements such as Cystopteris protrusa, C. reevesiana, and C. tenuis, and identifying sterile hybrids, C. fragilis still remains a polymorphic and complex taxon that probably contains a number of natural, cryptic evolutionary units. For example, morphologically distinct hexaploid cytotypes have been reported (C. H. Haufler and M. D. Windham 1991). These occur as isolated and disjunct populations in Ontario, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Montana, and Wyoming. Isozymic profiles of each of these populations indicate that the hexaploids are polyphyletic and should not be accorded species status.</p><!--
+
|discussion=<p><i>Cystopteris fragilis</i> is most often confused with <i>C. tenuis</i> in the east and <i>C. reevesiana</i> in the southwest. Habitat and geography, as well as the morphologic features discussed in the key, usually serve to separate these taxa. For instance, <i>C. fragilis</i> is more likely to be found on cliffs whereas the other species prefer boulders and soil (<i>C. fragilis</i> occurs at higher elevations and/or latitudes than the other species). These distinctions can be confounded when <i>C. fragilis</i> forms hybrids with sympatric species. Sterile pentaploid plants have been discovered where <i>C. fragilis</i> overlaps with <i>C. laurentiana</i>, tetraploid hybrids are likely where <i>C. fragilis</i> occurs with <i>C. tenuis</i>, and triploids may form where <i>C. fragilis</i> is found with <i>C. reevesiana</i>. Even after segregating relatively distinct elements such as <i>Cystopteris protrusa</i>, <i>C. reevesiana</i>, and <i>C. tenuis</i>, and identifying sterile hybrids, <i>C. fragilis</i> still remains a polymorphic and complex taxon that probably contains a number of natural, cryptic evolutionary units. For example, morphologically distinct hexaploid cytotypes have been reported (C. H. Haufler and M. D. Windham 1991). These occur as isolated and disjunct populations in Ontario, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Montana, and Wyoming. Isozymic profiles of each of these populations indicate that the hexaploids are polyphyletic and should not be accorded species status.</p><!--
--><p>The presence of verrucate spores (as opposed to the normal spiny spores) has been used to circumscribe Cystopteris dickieana. Although genetic analyses have not been undertaken, we think the verrucate spore is probably a recessive feature controlled by one or a few genes. While present at low frequency in much of the range of C. fragilis, verrucate spores are particularly prominent in the Great Plains. Perhaps in this region the genetic combinations specifying verrucate spores have been fixed. Following R. F. Blasdell (1963), C. dickieana is also considered here to be conspecific with C. fragilis because (1) early stages in the development of spiny spores can appear verrucate (A. C. Jermy and L. Harper 1971), (2) the hexaploid cytotypes discussed above always have verrucate spores, regardless of their parentage, (3) individuals with verrucate spores can be found in populations that are otherwise uniformly spiny-spored, and (4) individuals and populations that have verrucate spores are not otherwise (morphologically, ecologically, or genetically) distinct from those that have spiny spores.</p><!--
+
--><p>The presence of verrucate spores (as opposed to the normal spiny spores) has been used to circumscribe <i>Cystopteris</i> dickieana. Although genetic analyses have not been undertaken, we think the verrucate spore is probably a recessive feature controlled by one or a few genes. While present at low frequency in much of the range of <i>C. fragilis</i>, verrucate spores are particularly prominent in the Great Plains. Perhaps in this region the genetic combinations specifying verrucate spores have been fixed. Following R. F. Blasdell (1963), C. dickieana is also considered here to be conspecific with <i>C. fragilis</i> because (1) early stages in the development of spiny spores can appear verrucate (A. C. Jermy and L. Harper 1971), (2) the hexaploid cytotypes discussed above always have verrucate spores, regardless of their parentage, (3) individuals with verrucate spores can be found in populations that are otherwise uniformly spiny-spored, and (4) individuals and populations that have verrucate spores are not otherwise (morphologically, ecologically, or genetically) distinct from those that have spiny spores.</p><!--
--><p>Especially in the western portion of its North American range (British Columbia, Washington, Montana, Idaho, Oregon, California), Cystopteris fragilis appears to be developing morphologically and ecologically distinctive variants. Hybrid individuals with aborted spores have been discovered, and plants from these areas increasingly tend to grow on both soil and rock and to have slightly different morphologies on the two substrates. These variants intergrade, however, and are not sufficiently distinct to warrant species status. This polymorphic polyploid is probably actively speciating at the tetraploid level, perhaps through gene silencing (C. R. Werth and M. D. Windham 1991).</p>
+
--><p>Especially in the western portion of its North American range (British Columbia, Washington, Montana, Idaho, Oregon, California), <i>Cystopteris fragilis</i> appears to be developing morphologically and ecologically distinctive variants. Hybrid individuals with aborted spores have been discovered, and plants from these areas increasingly tend to grow on both soil and rock and to have slightly different morphologies on the two substrates. These variants intergrade, however, and are not sufficiently distinct to warrant species status. This polymorphic polyploid is probably actively speciating at the tetraploid level, perhaps through gene silencing (C. R. Werth and M. D. Windham 1991).</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 43: Line 49:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Cystopteris fragilis
 
name=Cystopteris fragilis
|author=
 
 
|authority=(Linnaeus) Bernhardi
 
|authority=(Linnaeus) Bernhardi
 
|rank=species
 
|rank=species
Line 50: Line 55:
 
|basionyms=Polypodium fragile
 
|basionyms=Polypodium fragile
 
|family=Dryopteridaceae
 
|family=Dryopteridaceae
 +
|phenology=Sporulating summer–fall.
 
|habitat=Mostly on cliff faces, also in thin soil over rock
 
|habitat=Mostly on cliff faces, also in thin soil over rock
 
|elevation=0–4500 m
 
|elevation=0–4500 m
|distribution=Greenland;St. Pierre and Miquelon;Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld.;N.W.T.;N.S.;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Yukon;Alaska;Calif.;Colo.;Conn.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Maine;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Oreg.;Pa.;S.Dak.;Tex.;Utah;Vt.;Wash.;Wis.;Wyo.;worldwide.
+
|distribution=Greenland;St. Pierre and Miquelon;Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld. and Labr.;N.W.T.;N.S.;Nunavut;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Yukon;Alaska;Calif.;Colo.;Conn.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Maine;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Oreg.;Pa.;S.Dak.;Tex.;Utah;Vt.;Wash.;Wis.;Wyo.;worldwide.
 
|reference=None
 
|reference=None
 
|publication title=Neues J. Bot.
 
|publication title=Neues J. Bot.
|publication year=1806
+
|publication year=1805
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-fine-grained-xml.git/src/287ef3db526bd807d435a3c7423ef2df1e951227/V2/V2_806.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V2/V2_806.xml
 
|genus=Cystopteris
 
|genus=Cystopteris
 
|species=Cystopteris fragilis
 
|species=Cystopteris fragilis
|2n chromosome count=252;168
 
|apex shape=acute
 
|axil architecture=multicellular
 
|base architecture or pubescence=scaly
 
|base shape=truncate;obtuse
 
|blade shape=1(-2)-pinnate-pinnatifid;lanceolate;narrowly elliptic
 
|blade variability=equaling
 
|blade width=widest
 
|bulblet architecture=gland-tipped
 
|bulblet count=lacking
 
|distal pinna shape=deltate;ovate
 
|hair architecture=gland-tipped;gland-tipped;gland-tipped
 
|hair count=lacking;absent
 
|indusium shape=ovate;lanceolate
 
|internode height or length or size=short
 
|leaf architecture=monomorphic
 
|leaf arrangement or growth form=clustered
 
|leaf some measurement=0cm;40cm
 
|lumina coloration=tan
 
|margin architecture or shape=serrate;sharply dentate
 
|middle position=middle
 
|petiole base life cycle=old
 
|petiole coloration=mostly green;straw-colored
 
|petiole height or length or size=shorter
 
|pinna count=lacking
 
|pinna course=not curving
 
|pinna orientation=perpendicular
 
|pinnule architecture=sessile
 
|pinnule orientation=basiscopic;basiscopic
 
|pinnule size=not enlarged
 
|proximal pinna architecture or shape=equilateral
 
|proximal pinna shape=pinnatifid;pinnate-pinnatifid
 
|scale coloration=tan;light-brown
 
|scale shape=lanceolate
 
|spore architecture or shape=spiny
 
|spore relief=verrucate
 
|spore some measurement=39um;60um
 
|stem growth form or orientation=creeping
 
|stem shape=not cordlike
 
|vein orientation=directed
 
|wall arrangement=radial
 
|wall width=thin
 
 
}}<!--
 
}}<!--
  
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Cystopteris]]
+
-->
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Treatment]]
 +
[[Category:Cystopteris]]
 +
[[Category:Revised Since Print]]

Latest revision as of 20:18, 20 February 2024

Stems creeping, not cordlike, internodes short, beset with old petiole bases, hairs absent; scales tan to light brown, lanceolate, radial walls thin, luminae tan. Leaves monomorphic, clustered at stem apex, to 40 cm, nearly all bearing sori. Petiole dark at base, mostly green to straw-colored distally, shorter than or nearly equaling blade, base sparsely scaly. Blade lanceolate to narrowly elliptic, 1(–2)-pinnate-pinnatifid, widest at or just below middle, apex acute; rachis and costae lacking gland-tipped hairs or bulblets; axils of pinnae lacking multicellular, gland-tipped hairs. Pinnae usually perpendicular to rachis, not curving toward blade apex, margins serrate to sharply dentate; proximal pinnae pinnatifid to pinnate-pinnatifid, ± equilateral, basiscopic pinnules not enlarged; basal basiscopic pinnules sessile, base truncate to obtuse, distal pinnae deltate to ovate. Veins directed mostly into teeth. Indusia ovate to lanceolate, without gland-tipped hairs. Spores spiny or verrucate, usually 39–60 µm. 2n = 168, 252.


Phenology: Sporulating summer–fall.
Habitat: Mostly on cliff faces, also in thin soil over rock
Elevation: 0–4500 m

Distribution

V2 806-distribution-map.gif

Greenland, St. Pierre and Miquelon, Alta., B.C., Man., N.B., Nfld. and Labr., N.W.T., N.S., Nunavut, Ont., P.E.I., Que., Sask., Yukon, Alaska, Calif., Colo., Conn., Idaho, Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Maine, Mass., Mich., Minn., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.H., N.Mex., N.Y., N.Dak., Ohio, Oreg., Pa., S.Dak., Tex., Utah, Vt., Wash., Wis., Wyo., worldwide.

Discussion

Cystopteris fragilis is most often confused with C. tenuis in the east and C. reevesiana in the southwest. Habitat and geography, as well as the morphologic features discussed in the key, usually serve to separate these taxa. For instance, C. fragilis is more likely to be found on cliffs whereas the other species prefer boulders and soil (C. fragilis occurs at higher elevations and/or latitudes than the other species). These distinctions can be confounded when C. fragilis forms hybrids with sympatric species. Sterile pentaploid plants have been discovered where C. fragilis overlaps with C. laurentiana, tetraploid hybrids are likely where C. fragilis occurs with C. tenuis, and triploids may form where C. fragilis is found with C. reevesiana. Even after segregating relatively distinct elements such as Cystopteris protrusa, C. reevesiana, and C. tenuis, and identifying sterile hybrids, C. fragilis still remains a polymorphic and complex taxon that probably contains a number of natural, cryptic evolutionary units. For example, morphologically distinct hexaploid cytotypes have been reported (C. H. Haufler and M. D. Windham 1991). These occur as isolated and disjunct populations in Ontario, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Montana, and Wyoming. Isozymic profiles of each of these populations indicate that the hexaploids are polyphyletic and should not be accorded species status.

The presence of verrucate spores (as opposed to the normal spiny spores) has been used to circumscribe Cystopteris dickieana. Although genetic analyses have not been undertaken, we think the verrucate spore is probably a recessive feature controlled by one or a few genes. While present at low frequency in much of the range of C. fragilis, verrucate spores are particularly prominent in the Great Plains. Perhaps in this region the genetic combinations specifying verrucate spores have been fixed. Following R. F. Blasdell (1963), C. dickieana is also considered here to be conspecific with C. fragilis because (1) early stages in the development of spiny spores can appear verrucate (A. C. Jermy and L. Harper 1971), (2) the hexaploid cytotypes discussed above always have verrucate spores, regardless of their parentage, (3) individuals with verrucate spores can be found in populations that are otherwise uniformly spiny-spored, and (4) individuals and populations that have verrucate spores are not otherwise (morphologically, ecologically, or genetically) distinct from those that have spiny spores.

Especially in the western portion of its North American range (British Columbia, Washington, Montana, Idaho, Oregon, California), Cystopteris fragilis appears to be developing morphologically and ecologically distinctive variants. Hybrid individuals with aborted spores have been discovered, and plants from these areas increasingly tend to grow on both soil and rock and to have slightly different morphologies on the two substrates. These variants intergrade, however, and are not sufficiently distinct to warrant species status. This polymorphic polyploid is probably actively speciating at the tetraploid level, perhaps through gene silencing (C. R. Werth and M. D. Windham 1991).

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
... more about "Cystopteris fragilis"
Christopher H. Haufler +, Robbin C. Moran +  and Michael D. Windham +
(Linnaeus) Bernhardi +
Polypodium fragile +
Brittle fern +, fragile fern +  and cystoptère fragile +
Greenland +, St. Pierre and Miquelon +, Alta. +, B.C. +, Man. +, N.B. +, Nfld. and Labr. +, N.W.T. +, N.S. +, Nunavut +, Ont. +, P.E.I. +, Que. +, Sask. +, Yukon +, Alaska +, Calif. +, Colo. +, Conn. +, Idaho +, Ill. +, Ind. +, Iowa +, Kans. +, Maine +, Mass. +, Mich. +, Minn. +, Mont. +, Nebr. +, Nev. +, N.H. +, N.Mex. +, N.Y. +, N.Dak. +, Ohio +, Oreg. +, Pa. +, S.Dak. +, Tex. +, Utah +, Vt. +, Wash. +, Wis. +, Wyo. +  and worldwide. +
0–4500 m +
Mostly on cliff faces, also in thin soil over rock +
Sporulating summer–fall. +
Neues J. Bot. +
Cystopteris dickieana +  and Cystopteris fragilis subsp. dickieana +
Cystopteris fragilis +
Cystopteris +
species +