Difference between revisions of "Atriplex canescens"
Gen. N. Amer. Pl. 1: 197. 1818.
FNA>Volume Importer |
RevisionBot (talk | contribs) m (Bot: Adding category Revised Since Print) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Four-wing saltbu sh | |common_names=Four-wing saltbu sh | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status |
| + | |code=W | ||
| + | |label=Weedy | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=F | ||
| + | |label=Illustrated | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym | ||
|name=Calligonum canescens | |name=Calligonum canescens | ||
|authority=Pursh | |authority=Pursh | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
| + | |publication_title=Fl. Amer Sept. | ||
| + | |publication_place=2: 370. 1814 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=Atriplex nuttallii | |name=Atriplex nuttallii | ||
|authority=S. Watson | |authority=S. Watson | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Chenopodiaceae;Atriplex;Atriplex subg. Pterochiton;Atriplex canescens | |hierarchy=Chenopodiaceae;Atriplex;Atriplex subg. Pterochiton;Atriplex canescens | ||
| Line 26: | Line 37: | ||
-->{{Treatment/Body | -->{{Treatment/Body | ||
| − | |distribution= | + | |distribution=Alta.;Ariz.;Calif.;Colo.;Idaho;Kans.;Mont.;N.Dak.;N.Mex.;Nebr.;Nev.;Okla.;Oreg.;S.Dak.;Tex.;Utah;Wash.;Wyo.;Mexico. |
| − | |discussion=<p>This species forms hybrids with Atriplex confertifolia and A. gardneri varieties (see var. bonnevillensis). Materials from the vicinity of the type locality of the species in South Dakota are low subherbaceous plants that differ from our shrubby tall material. However, the type area is presently covered with water from a dam on the Missouri River, and it is not possible to exclude the possibility of A. canescens as it has been interpreted for the past century to have existed at that site during the Lewis and Clark Expedition, if that is indeed where the lectotype was collected.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p>This species forms hybrids with <i>Atriplex confertifolia</i> and <i>A. gardneri</i> varieties (see <i></i>var.<i> bonnevillensis</i>). Materials from the vicinity of the type locality of the species in South Dakota are low subherbaceous plants that differ from our shrubby tall material. However, the type area is presently covered with water from a dam on the Missouri River, and it is not possible to exclude the possibility of <i>A. canescens</i> as it has been interpreted for the past century to have existed at that site during the Lewis and Clark Expedition, if that is indeed where the lectotype was collected.</p><!-- |
--><p>Varieties 4 (4 in the flora).</p><!-- | --><p>Varieties 4 (4 in the flora).</p><!-- | ||
| − | --><p>Nuttall’s new combination Atriplex canescens was based on Calligonum canescens Pursh. Watson based his new name A. nuttallii directly on A. canescens Nuttall, i.e., including the citation of Nuttall’s “Genera, 1. 197,” and on its basionym, C. canescens. The name A. nuttallii is thus a nomenclatural synonym of A. canescens and was thus illegitimate at its inception. It cannot be resurrected by even the most sophisticated arguments. A sheet of Atriplex canescens, noted as “a shrub,” taken by Nuttall on the 1810 Missouri River expedition is extant in the Lambert herbarium (PH). It bears several, obviously shrubby, staminate flowering branches, but the only pistillate branch is very immature. The name A. gardneri, also cited provisionally by Watson within the concept of A. nuttallii, clearly has priority over other names for that widely distributed species complex. Attempts at leptotypification of the name nuttallii by J. McNeill et al. (1983) and H. C. Stutz and S. C. Sanderson (1998) are both superfluous, the name being illegitimate.</p><!-- | + | --><p>Nuttall’s new combination <i>Atriplex canescens</i> was based on Calligonum canescens Pursh. Watson based his new name <i>A. nuttallii</i> directly on <i>A. canescens</i> Nuttall, i.e., including the citation of Nuttall’s “Genera, 1. 197,” and on its basionym, <i>C. canescens</i>. The name <i>A. nuttallii</i> is thus a nomenclatural synonym of <i>A. canescens</i> and was thus illegitimate at its inception. It cannot be resurrected by even the most sophisticated arguments. A sheet of <i>Atriplex canescens</i>, noted as “a shrub,” taken by Nuttall on the 1810 Missouri River expedition is extant in the Lambert herbarium (PH). It bears several, obviously shrubby, staminate flowering branches, but the only pistillate branch is very immature. The name <i>A. gardneri</i>, also cited provisionally by Watson within the concept of <i>A. nuttallii</i>, clearly has priority over other names for that widely distributed species complex. Attempts at leptotypification of the name nuttallii by J. McNeill et al. (1983) and H. C. Stutz and S. C. Sanderson (1998) are both superfluous, the name being illegitimate.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>C. A. Hanson (1962) noted the similarity between the occasional wingless fruiting bracteoles of Atriplex canescens and A. gardneri var. falcata. He noted further that the bracts of both species lack lateral teeth subtending the terminal ones, have terminal teeth united half their length, and have indurate bracts. Whether such similarity indicates relationship or mere coincidence is open to question. However, A. canescens is known to form hybrids with most, if not all, portions of the gardneri complex and with other woody species whose range it overlaps as well.</p> | + | --><p>C. A. Hanson (1962) noted the similarity between the occasional wingless fruiting bracteoles of <i>Atriplex canescens</i> and <i>A. gardneri </i>var.<i> falcata</i>. He noted further that the bracts of both species lack lateral teeth subtending the terminal ones, have terminal teeth united half their length, and have indurate bracts. Whether such similarity indicates relationship or mere coincidence is open to question. However, <i>A. canescens</i> is known to form hybrids with most, if not all, portions of the gardneri complex and with other woody species whose range it overlaps as well.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references={{Treatment/Reference | |references={{Treatment/Reference | ||
| Line 72: | Line 83: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Atriplex canescens | name=Atriplex canescens | ||
| − | |||
|authority=(Pursh) Nuttall | |authority=(Pursh) Nuttall | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
| Line 79: | Line 89: | ||
|basionyms=Calligonum canescens | |basionyms=Calligonum canescens | ||
|family=Chenopodiaceae | |family=Chenopodiaceae | ||
| − | |distribution= | + | |distribution=Alta.;Ariz.;Calif.;Colo.;Idaho;Kans.;Mont.;N.Dak.;N.Mex.;Nebr.;Nev.;Okla.;Oreg.;S.Dak.;Tex.;Utah;Wash.;Wyo.;Mexico. |
|reference=stutz1979a | |reference=stutz1979a | ||
|publication title=Gen. N. Amer. Pl. | |publication title=Gen. N. Amer. Pl. | ||
|publication year=1818 | |publication year=1818 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Weedy;Illustrated |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_752.xml |
|genus=Atriplex | |genus=Atriplex | ||
|subgenus=Atriplex subg. Pterochiton | |subgenus=Atriplex subg. Pterochiton | ||
| Line 90: | Line 100: | ||
}}<!-- | }}<!-- | ||
| − | -->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Atriplex subg. Pterochiton]] | + | --> |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Treatment]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Atriplex subg. Pterochiton]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Revised Since Print]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:01, 6 November 2020
Shrubs, dioecious or rarely monoecious, mainly 8–20 dm, as wide or wider, not especially armed. Leaves persistent, alternate, sessile or nearly so, blade linear to oblanceolate, oblong, or obovate, mainly 10–40 × 3–8 mm, margin entire, apex retuse to obtuse. Staminate flowers yellow (rarely brown), in clusters 2–3 mm wide, borne in panicles 3–15 cm. Pistillate flowers borne in panicles 5–40 cm. Fruiting bracteoles 8–25 mm, as wide, on stipes 1–8 mm, with 4 prominent wings extending the bract length, united throughout, wings dentate to entire, apex toothed, surface of wings and body smooth or reticulate. Seeds 1.5–2.5 mm wide. 2n = 18, 36+.
Distribution
Alta., Ariz., Calif., Colo., Idaho, Kans., Mont., N.Dak., N.Mex., Nebr., Nev., Okla., Oreg., S.Dak., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wyo., Mexico.
Discussion
This species forms hybrids with Atriplex confertifolia and A. gardneri varieties (see var. bonnevillensis). Materials from the vicinity of the type locality of the species in South Dakota are low subherbaceous plants that differ from our shrubby tall material. However, the type area is presently covered with water from a dam on the Missouri River, and it is not possible to exclude the possibility of A. canescens as it has been interpreted for the past century to have existed at that site during the Lewis and Clark Expedition, if that is indeed where the lectotype was collected.
Varieties 4 (4 in the flora).
Nuttall’s new combination Atriplex canescens was based on Calligonum canescens Pursh. Watson based his new name A. nuttallii directly on A. canescens Nuttall, i.e., including the citation of Nuttall’s “Genera, 1. 197,” and on its basionym, C. canescens. The name A. nuttallii is thus a nomenclatural synonym of A. canescens and was thus illegitimate at its inception. It cannot be resurrected by even the most sophisticated arguments. A sheet of Atriplex canescens, noted as “a shrub,” taken by Nuttall on the 1810 Missouri River expedition is extant in the Lambert herbarium (PH). It bears several, obviously shrubby, staminate flowering branches, but the only pistillate branch is very immature. The name A. gardneri, also cited provisionally by Watson within the concept of A. nuttallii, clearly has priority over other names for that widely distributed species complex. Attempts at leptotypification of the name nuttallii by J. McNeill et al. (1983) and H. C. Stutz and S. C. Sanderson (1998) are both superfluous, the name being illegitimate.
C. A. Hanson (1962) noted the similarity between the occasional wingless fruiting bracteoles of Atriplex canescens and A. gardneri var. falcata. He noted further that the bracts of both species lack lateral teeth subtending the terminal ones, have terminal teeth united half their length, and have indurate bracts. Whether such similarity indicates relationship or mere coincidence is open to question. However, A. canescens is known to form hybrids with most, if not all, portions of the gardneri complex and with other woody species whose range it overlaps as well.
Lower Taxa
Key
| 1 | Fruiting bracteoles merely dentate to entire, commonly 8-25 mm wide; plants of broad or other distribution | > 2 |
| 1 | Fruiting bracteoles dentate to laciniate, mainly 5-10 mm wide; plants of s California | > 3 |
| 2 | Bracteoles mainly less than 12 mm wide; plants not layering in sand dunes, widespread | Atriplex canescens var. canescens |
| 2 | Bracteoles mainly 15- mm wide; plants layering in sand dunes, cw Utah | Atriplex canescens var. gigantea |
| 3 | Fruiting bracteoles mainly 4-8 mm wide, dentate or laciniate; shrubs mainly 3-10 dm | Atriplex canescens var. macilenta |
| 3 | Fruiting bracteoles mainly 8-11 mm wide, la- ciniate; shrubs mainly 10-20 dm | Atriplex canescens var. laciniata |