Difference between revisions of "Perityle warnockii"
Sida 3: 177, fig. 1. 1966.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Warnock’s rock daisy | |common_names=Warnock’s rock daisy | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=E | ||
| + | |label=Endemic | ||
| + | }}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=C | ||
| + | |label=Conservation concern | ||
| + | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|synonyms= | |synonyms= | ||
| Line 47: | Line 54: | ||
|publication title=Sida | |publication title=Sida | ||
|publication year=1966 | |publication year=1966 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Endemic;Conservation concern |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_804.xml |
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | |tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae | ||
|subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Peritylinae | |subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Peritylinae | ||
Latest revision as of 20:14, 5 November 2020
Perennials or subshrubs, 2–10 cm; densely scabrous-pubescent. Leaves: petioles 2–5(–8) mm; blades lance-ovate, ovate, or suborbiculate, 6–10 × 4–8(–10) mm, margins serrate. Heads borne singly (often partially obscured by leaves), 7–10 × 4–7 mm. Peduncles 1–7 mm. Involucres campanulate. Phyllaries 9–10, linear to lanceolate, 5–7 × 1.2–2.2 mm. Ray florets 0. Disc florets 9–12; corollas bright white, tubes 0.6–1 mm, throats subfunnelform, 2–2.5 mm, lobes 1–1.6 mm. Cypselae oblong to oblanceolate, 2.2–2.8 mm, margins notably calloused, glabrous; pappi callous crowns, bristles 0. 2n = 34.
Phenology: Flowering spring–fall.
Habitat: Limestone
Elevation: 500–700 m
Discussion
Of conservation concern.
Perityle warnockii is known only from the type locality in Val Verde County. The relationship of P. warnockii to P. bisetosa is evidenced by its similar though often reduced vegetative and floral morphology. The two species may have been derived separately from a common ancestor, perhaps a white-flowered member of sect. Pappothrix such as P. vitreomontana.
Selected References
None.