Difference between revisions of "Psilocarphus chilensis"
in A. Gray et al., Syn. Fl. N. Amer. ed. 2, 1: 448. 1886.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Treatment/ID | {{Treatment/ID | ||
|accepted_name=Psilocarphus chilensis | |accepted_name=Psilocarphus chilensis | ||
| − | |accepted_authority=A. Gray | + | |accepted_authority=A. Gray |
|publications={{Treatment/Publication | |publications={{Treatment/Publication | ||
|title=in A. Gray et al., Syn. Fl. N. Amer. ed. | |title=in A. Gray et al., Syn. Fl. N. Amer. ed. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Round woolly marbles | |common_names=Round woolly marbles | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Micropus globiferus | |name=Micropus globiferus | ||
|authority=Bertero ex de Candolle | |authority=Bertero ex de Candolle | ||
| + | |rank=species | ||
| + | |publication_title=in A. P. de Candolle and A. L. P. P. de Candolle, Prodr. | ||
| + | |publication_place=5: 460. 1836, | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | |synonyms={{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=P. tenellus var. globiferus | |name=P. tenellus var. globiferus | ||
|authority=(Bertero ex de Candolle) Morefield | |authority=(Bertero ex de Candolle) Morefield | ||
| − | }}{{Treatment/ID/Synonym | + | |rank=variety |
| + | }} {{Treatment/ID/Synonym | ||
|name=P. tenellus var. tenuis | |name=P. tenellus var. tenuis | ||
|authority=(Eastwood) Cronquist | |authority=(Eastwood) Cronquist | ||
| + | |rank=variety | ||
}} | }} | ||
|hierarchy=Asteraceae;Asteraceae tribe Gnaphalieae;Psilocarphus;Psilocarphus chilensis | |hierarchy=Asteraceae;Asteraceae tribe Gnaphalieae;Psilocarphus;Psilocarphus chilensis | ||
| Line 33: | Line 38: | ||
|elevation=0–600 m | |elevation=0–600 m | ||
|distribution=Calif.;South America (Chile). | |distribution=Calif.;South America (Chile). | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Psilocarphus chilensis occurs mainly in west-central California and central Chile; one recent collection is from southern California (western Riverside County). Ecotypes from coastal interdune areas are more lanuginose with shorter stems and internodes than intergrading populations farther inland; they are indistinguishable from the type of Micropus globiferus from Chile (J. D. Morefield 1992d). Psilocarphus chilensis and P. tenellus are at least as distinct as the other species of Psilocarphus; contrary to suggestions by A. Cronquist (1950), intermediates between the two are at most very uncommon.</p><!-- | + | |discussion=<p><i>Psilocarphus chilensis</i> occurs mainly in west-central California and central Chile; one recent collection is from southern California (western Riverside County). Ecotypes from coastal interdune areas are more lanuginose with shorter stems and internodes than intergrading populations farther inland; they are indistinguishable from the type of <i>Micropus</i> globiferus from Chile (J. D. Morefield 1992d). <i>Psilocarphus chilensis</i> and <i>P. tenellus</i> are at least as distinct as the other species of <i>Psilocarphus</i>; contrary to suggestions by A. Cronquist (1950), intermediates between the two are at most very uncommon.</p><!-- |
| − | --><p>Psilocarphus berteri I. M. Johnston is a superfluous name for P. chilensis. I. M. Johnston (1938) erroneously applied P. chilensis to a species not including the type of Micropus globiferus; such plants are here included in P. brevissimus var. brevissimus.</p> | + | --><p><i>Psilocarphus</i> berteri I. M. Johnston is a superfluous name for <i>P. chilensis</i>. I. M. Johnston (1938) erroneously applied <i>P. chilensis</i> to a species not including the type of <i>Micropus</i> globiferus; such plants are here included in <i>P. brevissimus </i>var.<i> brevissimus</i>.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
| Line 43: | Line 48: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Psilocarphus chilensis | name=Psilocarphus chilensis | ||
| − | + | |authority=A. Gray | |
| − | |authority=A. Gray | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
|parent rank=genus | |parent rank=genus | ||
| Line 58: | Line 62: | ||
|publication year=1886 | |publication year=1886 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V19_765.xml |
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Gnaphalieae | |tribe=Asteraceae tribe Gnaphalieae | ||
|genus=Psilocarphus | |genus=Psilocarphus | ||
Latest revision as of 19:55, 5 November 2020
Plants mostly greenish, thinly arachnoid-sericeous (in coastal forms grayish to whitish, ± lanuginose). Stems mostly (1–)2–7, ascending to ± prostrate; proximal internode lengths (2–)3–6 times leaf lengths. Capitular leaves erect to incurved, appressed to heads, ovate to broadly elliptic, widest in proximal 2/3, longest 5–12 mm, lengths mostly 1.2–1.8(–2) times widths, 1–2(–2.5) times head heights. Heads ± spheric, largest 3–5.5 mm. Receptacles unlobed. Pistillate paleae usually individually visible through indument, longest mostly 1.5–2.7 mm. Staminate corollas 0.8–1.3 mm, lobes mostly 4. Cypselae narrowly obovoid, somewhat compressed, 0.6–1.2 mm.
Phenology: Flowering and fruiting mid Mar–early Jul.
Habitat: Saturated to drying vernal pool margins, seasonally inundated sites, coastal interdune areas
Elevation: 0–600 m
Distribution
Calif., South America (Chile).
Discussion
Psilocarphus chilensis occurs mainly in west-central California and central Chile; one recent collection is from southern California (western Riverside County). Ecotypes from coastal interdune areas are more lanuginose with shorter stems and internodes than intergrading populations farther inland; they are indistinguishable from the type of Micropus globiferus from Chile (J. D. Morefield 1992d). Psilocarphus chilensis and P. tenellus are at least as distinct as the other species of Psilocarphus; contrary to suggestions by A. Cronquist (1950), intermediates between the two are at most very uncommon.
Psilocarphus berteri I. M. Johnston is a superfluous name for P. chilensis. I. M. Johnston (1938) erroneously applied P. chilensis to a species not including the type of Micropus globiferus; such plants are here included in P. brevissimus var. brevissimus.
Selected References
None.