Difference between revisions of "Buckleya"

Torrey

Amer. J. Sci. Arts 45: 170. 1843. name conserved

Etymology: For Samuel Botsford Buckley, 1809–1884, American botanist
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 12. Treatment on page 413. Mentioned on page 414.
FNA>Volume Importer
imported>Volume Importer
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|place=45: 170. 1843
 
|place=45: 170. 1843
 
|year=1843
 
|year=1843
 +
|other_info_on_pub=name conserved
 
}}
 
}}
 
|basionyms=
 
|basionyms=
Line 25: Line 26:
 
--><p><i>Buckleya</i> is disjunct between eastern North America and Asia. Based on morphologic features such as the deciduous sepals, W. N. Carvell and W. H. Eshbaugh (1982) proposed that <i>B. distichophylla</i> is most closely related to B. graebneriana Diels of China, a hypothesis supported by the molecular phylogenetic analysis of Li J. H. et al. (2001).</p>
 
--><p><i>Buckleya</i> is disjunct between eastern North America and Asia. Based on morphologic features such as the deciduous sepals, W. N. Carvell and W. H. Eshbaugh (1982) proposed that <i>B. distichophylla</i> is most closely related to B. graebneriana Diels of China, a hypothesis supported by the molecular phylogenetic analysis of Li J. H. et al. (2001).</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
|references=
+
|references={{Treatment/Reference
 +
|id=carvell1982a
 +
|text=Carvell, W. N. and W. H. Eshbaugh. 1982. A systematic study of the genus Buckleya (Santalaceae). Castanea 47: 17–37.
 +
}}{{Treatment/Reference
 +
|id=li2001a
 +
|text=Li, J. H., D. E. Boufford, and M. J. Donoghue. 2001. Phylogenetics of Buckleya (Santalaceae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Rhodora 103: 137–150.
 +
}}
 
}}<!--
 
}}<!--
  
Line 39: Line 46:
 
|family=Thesiaceae
 
|family=Thesiaceae
 
|distribution=e United States;e Asia (China;Japan).
 
|distribution=e United States;e Asia (China;Japan).
|reference=None
+
|reference=carvell1982a;li2001a
 
|publication title=Amer. J. Sci. Arts
 
|publication title=Amer. J. Sci. Arts
 
|publication year=1843
 
|publication year=1843
 
|special status=
 
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/eaa6e58056e40c9ef614d8f47aea294977a1a5e9/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V12/V12_875.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V12/V12_875.xml
 
|genus=Buckleya
 
|genus=Buckleya
 
}}<!--
 
}}<!--
  
 
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Thesiaceae]]
 
-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Thesiaceae]]

Latest revision as of 19:18, 5 November 2020

Shrubs, dioecious. Stems hairy. Leaves opposite or subopposite, distichous to decussate. Inflorescences: staminate 1–3[–5] dichasia, pistillate flowers solitary, subtended by 2 pairs of decussate, deciduous bracts. Pedicels: staminate present, pistillate absent. Flowers unisexual. Staminate flowers: hypanthium absent; sepals 0; petals 4, post-staminal hairs absent; nectary squarish; stamens 4. Pistillate flowers: hypanthium completely adnate to ovary; sepals 4; petals 4; nectary squarish; ovules 3–4 per locule; stigma 4-lobed. Pseudodrupes: exocarp fleshy; pedicels not enlarging or becoming fleshy; sepals accrescent, deciduous [persistent], petals deciduous. x = 15.

Distribution

e United States, e Asia (China, Japan).

Discussion

5 species (1 in the flora).

The morphologic nature of the two floral whorls appearing at the fruit apex has received various interpretations. R. K. F. Pilger (1935) referred to the outer whorl as bracts and suggested that they are prophylls from two aborted side flowers of a dichasium. A simpler explanation, followed here, is that the outer whorl represents sepals and the inner whorl petals (F. H. Smith and E. C. Smith 1943; J. P. Der and D. L. Nickrent 2008).

Buckleya is disjunct between eastern North America and Asia. Based on morphologic features such as the deciduous sepals, W. N. Carvell and W. H. Eshbaugh (1982) proposed that B. distichophylla is most closely related to B. graebneriana Diels of China, a hypothesis supported by the molecular phylogenetic analysis of Li J. H. et al. (2001).