Difference between revisions of "Rosa subg. Hesperhodos"
Man. Cult. Trees ed. 2, 451. 1940.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|year=1940 | |year=1940 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/ | + | |basionyms={{Treatment/ID/Basionym |
|name=Undefined subg. Hesperhodos | |name=Undefined subg. Hesperhodos | ||
|authority=Cockerell | |authority=Cockerell | ||
| + | |publication_title=Nature | ||
| + | |publication_place=90: 571. 1913 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|synonyms= | |synonyms= | ||
| Line 48: | Line 50: | ||
|publication year=1940 | |publication year=1940 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
| − | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_113.xml |
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | |subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae | ||
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Roseae | |tribe=Rosaceae tribe Roseae | ||
Revision as of 20:35, 24 September 2019
Leaves 1.5–3 cm; leaflets 3–7, margins deeply incised or broadly crenate, sometimes serrate, terminal: petiolule 0.5–4 mm, blade oval, suborbiculate, obovate, or deltate, base cuneate. Inflorescences 1(–3)-flowered. Pedicels: bracts present or absent. Flowers: hypanthium subglobose to globose or cupulate, densely pubescent or glabrous, setose or not, glandular or eglandular; carpels 10–110 (average 65), styles free, pilose, stylar orifice 2–5 mm diam., rims 0.5–1 mm wide, hypanthial disc absent. Hips leathery, setose.
Distribution
sw, sc United States, nw Mexico.
Discussion
Species 2 (2 in the flora).
A phylogenetic analysis using plastid DNA sequences suggests that subg. Hesperhodos is sister to the rest of Rosa, but with weak support (A. Bruneau et al. 2007). This contrasts with analyses indicating that R. persica Michaux of subg. Hulthemia (Dumortier) Focke is sister to the remainder of the genus (S. Wu et al. 2001; V. Wissemann and C. M. Ritz 2005). A more compelling resolution might be possible once the related and more variable R. stellata is examined phylogenetically.