Difference between revisions of "Carex sect. Lamprochlaenae"
in J. M. Coulter, Man. Bot. Rocky Mt., 377. 1885.
FNA>Volume Importer |
FNA>Volume Importer |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|distribution=North America;Eurasia;and nw Africa. | |distribution=North America;Eurasia;and nw Africa. | ||
|discussion=<p>Species 12 (2 in the flora).</p><!-- | |discussion=<p>Species 12 (2 in the flora).</p><!-- | ||
− | --><p>K. K. Mackenzie (1931–1935, parts 2–3, pp. 182, 221) did not recognize the section. He placed C. supina in sect. Obtusatae and C. glacialis in sect. Petraeae (sect. Rupestres). Other authors have not associated these species with unispicate species and, recently, sect. Lamprochlaenae has been recognized, although circumscription of the section has varied (V. I. Kreczetowicz 1935; A. O. Chater 1980; T. V. Egorova 1999). The circumscription followed here is that proposed by Egorova.</p> | + | --><p>K. K. Mackenzie (1931–1935, parts 2–3, pp. 182, 221) did not recognize the section. He placed <i>C. supina</i> in sect. Obtusatae and <i>C. glacialis</i> in sect. Petraeae (sect. Rupestres). Other authors have not associated these species with unispicate species and, recently, sect. Lamprochlaenae has been recognized, although circumscription of the section has varied (V. I. Kreczetowicz 1935; A. O. Chater 1980; T. V. Egorova 1999). The circumscription followed here is that proposed by Egorova.</p> |
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references= | |references= | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
|publication year=1885 | |publication year=1885 | ||
|special status= | |special status= | ||
− | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/ | + | |source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V23/V23_1059.xml |
|genus=Carex | |genus=Carex | ||
|section=Carex sect. Lamprochlaenae | |section=Carex sect. Lamprochlaenae |
Revision as of 16:04, 18 September 2019
Plants densely or loosely cespitose, short to long rhizomatous. Culms red or purple at base. Leaves: basal sheaths fibrous or not; sheath fronts membranous; sheaths and larger leaves sometimes septate-nodulose; blades V-shaped in cross section when young, widest leaf blades 1–2 mm wide, glabrous. Inflorescences racemose, with 2–4(–5) spikes; bracts sheathless or short-sheathing, less than 4 mm, scalelike or with short threadlike blade; lateral spikes pistillate, subsessile to short-pedunculate, prophyllate; terminal spike staminate. Proximal pistillate scales white-hyaline or red-brown, apex obtuse to acuminate. Perigynia ascending to spreading, veinless or obscurely veined with 2 distinct marginal veins, ovate to obovate, rounded-trigonous in cross section, base tapering or rounded and shortly stipitate, apex to abrupt beak, glabrous; beak 0.3–0.9 mm, orifice entire or shortly bidentate. Stigmas 3. Achenes trigonous, almost as large as bodies of perigynia; styles deciduous.
Distribution
North America, Eurasia, and nw Africa.
Discussion
Species 12 (2 in the flora).
K. K. Mackenzie (1931–1935, parts 2–3, pp. 182, 221) did not recognize the section. He placed C. supina in sect. Obtusatae and C. glacialis in sect. Petraeae (sect. Rupestres). Other authors have not associated these species with unispicate species and, recently, sect. Lamprochlaenae has been recognized, although circumscription of the section has varied (V. I. Kreczetowicz 1935; A. O. Chater 1980; T. V. Egorova 1999). The circumscription followed here is that proposed by Egorova.
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
Key
1 | Perigynia yellow-green to brown, 2.5–3.3 × 1.2–2 mm; staminate scales 3–4.5 mm, light brown; plants loosely cespitose, usually long-rhizomatous. | Carex supina |
1 | Perigynia reddish black to dark brown distally, 1.5–2.5 × 0.9–1.2 mm; staminate scales 2–3 mm, reddish black or dark brown; plants densely cespitose, short-rhizomatous. | Carex glacialis |