View source for Chenopodium album

{{Treatment/ID
|accepted_name=Chenopodium album
|accepted_authority=Linnaeus
|publications={{Treatment/Publication
|title=Sp. Pl.
|place=1: 219. 1753
|year=1753
}}
|common_names=Lamb’s-quarters;pigweed
|basionyms=
|synonyms=
|hierarchy=Chenopodiaceae;Chenopodium;Chenopodium subg. Chenopodium;Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium;Chenopodium subsect. Chenopodium;Chenopodium album
|hierarchy_nav=<div class="higher-taxa"><div class="higher-taxon"><small>family</small>[[Chenopodiaceae]]</div><div class="higher-taxon"><small>genus</small>[[Chenopodium]]</div><div class="higher-taxon"><small>subgenus</small>[[Chenopodium subg. Chenopodium]]</div><div class="higher-taxon"><small>section</small>[[Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium]]</div><div class="higher-taxon"><small>subsection</small>[[Chenopodium subsect. Chenopodium]]</div><div class="higher-taxon"><small>species</small>[[Chenopodium album]]</div></div>
|volume=Volume 4
|mention_page=page 296
|treatment_page=
}}<!--

--><span class="statement" id="st-undefined" data-properties=""><b>Stems </b>erect to sprawling, simple to much-branched, 1–30 dm, sparsely to densely farinose. <b>Leaves</b> nonaromatic; petiole 1–2.5 cm, shorter than blades or occasionally longer; blade ovate-lanceolate to rhombic-lanceolate or broadly oblong, 1–5.5(–12) × 0.5–3.8(–8) cm, base narrowly to broadly cuneate, margins sinuous-dentate to shallowly serrate or entire, apex acute to subobtuse, farinose abaxially. <b>Inflorescences</b> glomerules or occasionally 1-flowered peduncles in terminal and lateral compound spikes, 2–19 cm; glomerules subglobose, 3–4 mm diam.; bracts absent. <b>Flowers</b>: perianth segments 5, distinct nearly to base; lobes ovate, ca. 1 × 1.1 mm, apex obtuse, keeled, farinose, largely covering fruit at maturity; stamens 5; stigmas 2, 0.2–0.3 mm. <b>Utricles</b> depressed-ovoid; pericarp nonadherent, occasionally adherent, smooth to papillate. <b>Seeds</b> lenticular, margins round, 0.9–1.6 mm diam.; seed coat black, smooth, indistinctly granulate and/or radially grooved, or with faint reticulate-rugose ridges. <b>2n</b> = 54.</span><!--

-->{{Treatment/Body
|phenology=Fruiting late summer–fall.
|habitat=Disturbed soils in open habitats
|elevation=0-1400 m
|distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld. and Labr.;N.W.T.;N.S.;Nunavut;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Yukon;Ala.;Alaska;Ariz.;Ark.;Calif.;Colo.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Fla.;Ga.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;La.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Tex.;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;Wyo.;probably mostly native in Europe.
|discussion=<p><i>Chenopodium album</i>, one of the worst weeds and most widespread synanthropic plants on the Earth, in its broad circumscription is also among the most polymorphic plant species. It is a loosely arranged aggregate of still insufficiently understood races. Hundreds of segregate microspecies and infraspecific entities (including nomenclatural combinations) of the <i>C. album</i> aggregate have been described and/or recognized by various authors. Some authors have recognized numerous segregate intergrading species, while others have developed elaborate infraspecific hierarchies with numerous subspecies, varieties, forms, and even numerous subforms (e.g., B. Jüttersonke and K. Arlt 1989), or have combined both approaches. Neither approach has brought satisfactory and uncontroversial results.</p><!--
--><p>It is evident that most recent evolutionary processes within the group were greatly affected by anthropic factors, including extensive recent invasions, hybridization between previously geographically isolated taxa, polyploidy, intensive selective processes and mutagenesis in synanthropic habitats, gene drift, and so forth. All of these modern factors further complicated the taxonomic situation. Consequently, no infraspecific taxa are formally recognized in the present treatment. We attempt, however, to outline below the most common or noteworthy groups currently placed in <i>Chenopodium album</i> sensu lato. Although we list such groups under binomials, they should be considered here as informal groupings rather than accepted species.</p><!--
--><p>It should be also kept in mind that many enigmatic and deviant forms of the <i>Chenopodium album</i> aggregate are in fact hybrids with other (occasionally several) species, and between infraspecific entities. <i>C. album</i> hybridizes with C. suecicum (producing C. ×fursajevii Aellen & Iljin), <i>C. opulifolium</i> (producing C. ×preissmannii Murr), <i>C. strictum</i> [producing C. ×pseudostriatum (Zschacke) Murr], <i>C. ficifolium</i> (producing C. ×jedlickae Dvorák or C. ×zahnii Murr), <i>C. berlandieri</i> (producing C. ×variabile Aellen), and some other species.</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium album</i> sensu stricto: plants usually erect, ± farinose, at maturity becoming yellowish green with reddish tint; not profusely branched, branches in proximal 1/2 mostly arching, in distal part straight and upright; proximal and middle cauline leaf blades ovate to weakly 3-lobed, margins dentate, teeth usually small and densely arranged; inflorescences normally condensed, spicate; seeds variable (especially in hybrids and deviate forms) but most often 1–1.25 mm diam., seed coat smooth or nearly so.</p><!--
--><p>The typical form of <i>Chenopodium album</i> is widespread in North America, but occurs sporadically and less commonly than the following form.</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium</i> lanceolatum Muhlenberg ex Willdenow: plants usually robust, erect to ascending, sparsely to moderately farinose, at maturity usually dark green; profusely branched, especially in inflorescence, branches arcuate and spreading; proximal and middle cauline leaf blades elliptic or elongate to narrowly lanceolate, base cuneate to narrowly cuneate, margins entire or with few teeth (usually in proximal 1/2); inflorescences normally much-branched, loosely paniculate, often nodding; seeds variable in size.</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium</i> lanceolatum is probably the most widespread and variable group of presumably hybridogenous forms in North America. I. J. Bassett and C. Crompton (1982) considered C. lanceolatum to be a form of <i>C. album</i>. It appears that the difference between these two taxa is based on habitat—<i>C. album</i> grows in cultivated ground and has an erect growth habit whereas C. lanceolatum grows in vacant lots, roadsides, etc., and has a more sprawling habit.</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium</i> pedunculare Bertoloni: plants similar to C. lanceolatum, but less robust, usually with ascending branches, sparsely to moderately farinose, at maturity dark green to yellowish; profusely branched, especially in inflorescence; proximal and middle cauline leaf blades ovate to broadly lanceolate (distal ones lanceolate), base rounded to cuneate, margins normally entire or with few teeth at base; inflorescences much-branched, loosely paniculate, nodding; seeds large, ca. 1.5 mm diam., seed coat smooth to irregularly and indistinctly grooved.</p><!--
--><p>Forms similar to the European ones occur in North America, but their exact distribution and taxonomic status are uncertain. The taxonomy of <i>Chenopodium</i> pedunculare was discussed in detail by F. Dvo ák (1984).</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium</i> suecicum Murr, and similar taxa including C. pseudopulifolium (J. B. Scholz) Murr: plants usually erect, sparsely to moderately farinose, or becoming glabrous, at maturity usually light green to dark green; branched in middle portion of stem and in inflorescence, branches straight to arcuate; proximal and middle cauline leaf blades elliptic or elongate to narrowly lanceolate, base cuneate to narrowly cuneate, margins variously 3-lobed and/or dentate, teeth few, usually large (especially in proximal 1/2); inflorescences much-branched, loosely paniculate; seeds variable, but predominantly ca. 1 mm diam., seed coat with indistinct elongate depressions and radial grooves, occasionally nearly smooth.</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium</i> suecicum was repeatedly reported from North America, mostly by European authors, and indeed, similar forms occur in the New World. However, their taxonomy is far from clear, and because of that they are treated here collectively, as an informal group of <i>C. album</i>. Some forms are transitional toward C. lanceolatum. Numerous forms of “C. syecucyn” were identified in North America as <i>C. album</i> sensu stricto or C. missouriense. The name C. paganum auct. was also widely misapplied.</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium</i> jenissejense Iljin: plants usually with erect or ascending (rarely prostrate) main stem, sparsely farinose to almost glabrous, deep olive green, at maturity becoming yellowish or reddish; not profusely branched, proximal branches arcuate to almost prostrate; proximal and middle cauline leaf blades ovate-deltoid, 3-lobed to indistinctly 3-lobed, margins of lobes entire or nearly so, teeth (if present) small and obtuse; inflorescences normally compact, spicate; perianth segments spreading at maturity, not covering fruit; seeds 1–1.4 mm diam., seed coat indistinctly pitted with weak radial grooves.</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium</i> jenissejense is a characteristic nonweedy alluvial taxon of sandy and gravelly river shores of northern Eurasia (northeastern European Russia, Siberia), related to C. acerifolium (see below). Several specimens collected in Alaska are probably referable to C. jenissejense; the available scarce material is not sufficient to confirm this.</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium</i> acerifolium Andrzejowsky: similar in morphology to C. jenissejense, this is a characteristic, predominantly nonweedy alluvial species confined to sandy habitats of eastern Europe and western Siberia. It has been reported as introduced in Colorado (W. A. Weber and R. C. Wittmann 1992); this record was probably based on misidentification of <i>C. berlandieri</i> (<i></i></i>var.<i><i> sinuatum</i>?).</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium</i> giganteum D. Don, C. centrorubrum (Makino) Nakai, C. probstii Aellen, and other similar forms: plants usually exceptionally robust, to 20–30 (occasionally more) dm, erect, ± densely farinose (mealy pubescence of young leaves usually reddish or yellowish), at maturity becoming yellowish green, yellow to deep beet red; variously (but usually not profusely) branched; proximal and middle cauline leaf blades large (to 15 cm), ovate to distinctly 3-lobed, margins dentate to ± entire; terminal inflorescences normally condensed, spicate (in some forms lax but large), lateral inflorescences usually weakly developed; seeds variable but most often ca 1.2 mm diam. or larger, seed coat smooth or nearly so.</p><!--
--><p>These taxa are probably all native to southern and southeastern Asia, where they were occasionally cultivated as ancient leaf vegetables and pseudocereals. In Japan and eastern China they were usually known as <i>Chenopodium</i> centrorubrum (Makino) Nakai, and in India and western China as <i>C. giganteum</i> D. Don. Other forms, such as C. amaranticolor Coste & Reynier, are of uncertain origin. <i>Chenopodium</i> probstii Aellen was described from Europe as an alien species supposedly introduced from Australia, but then its North American origin was suggested. Probably the forms discussed evolved independently in different parts of Eurasia and, consequently, represent different taxa of the <i>C. album</i> aggregate. Despite several painstaking efforts (e.g., P. Aellen 1929c; F. Dvo ák 1992), their taxonomy still remains confused and is in need of further experimental studies.</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium album</i> var. stevensii Aellen: plants with thick leaves and reduced size are possibly a phenotypic response to dry northern prairie habitats. It has been reported from southern Manitoba and northern parts of the upper Midwest.</p><!--
--><p><i>Chenopodium</i> missouriense Aellen: a confusing taxon because of its mixed typification. It appears to be a native form of <i>C. album</i> that flowers in mid September regardless of when it germinated. The inflorescences are somewhat reminiscent of <i>C. standleyanum</i>. It occurs in the United States in the central lowlands and part of the Appalachian plateau and is designated a weed (D. T. Patterson et al. 1989).</p>
|tables=
|references=
}}<!--

--><!--

-->{{#Taxon:
name=Chenopodium album
|author=
|authority=Linnaeus
|rank=species
|parent rank=subsection
|synonyms=
|basionyms=
|family=Chenopodiaceae
|phenology=Fruiting late summer–fall.
|habitat=Disturbed soils in open habitats
|elevation=0-1400 m
|distribution=Alta.;B.C.;Man.;N.B.;Nfld. and Labr.;N.W.T.;N.S.;Nunavut;Ont.;P.E.I.;Que.;Sask.;Yukon;Ala.;Alaska;Ariz.;Ark.;Calif.;Colo.;Conn.;Del.;D.C.;Fla.;Ga.;Idaho;Ill.;Ind.;Iowa;Kans.;Ky.;La.;Maine;Md.;Mass.;Mich.;Minn.;Miss.;Mo.;Mont.;Nebr.;Nev.;N.H.;N.J.;N.Mex.;N.Y.;N.C.;N.Dak.;Ohio;Okla.;Oreg.;Pa.;R.I.;S.C.;S.Dak.;Tenn.;Tex.;Utah;Vt.;Va.;Wash.;W.Va.;Wis.;Wyo.;probably mostly native in Europe.
|introduced=true
|reference=None
|publication title=Sp. Pl.
|publication year=1753
|special status=
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_571.xml
|genus=Chenopodium
|subgenus=Chenopodium subg. Chenopodium
|section=Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium
|subsection=Chenopodium subsect. Chenopodium
|species=Chenopodium album
}}<!--

-->[[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Chenopodium subsect. Chenopodium]]